[SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!

Tue Jun 9 16:34:51 PDT 2015

Hi all,

I can now confirm, officially, that Darwin Lescano was indeed the subject
of the warning issued by the VPD and he was arrested yesterday afternoon.
I just got off the phone with Detective Constable Linda Malcolm who
confirmed this with me.

Kerry

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:17 PM, <w.jc.pritchard at gmail.com> wrote:

> What if they arrested his doppelgänger? Until VPD issues a stand-down, I
> suggest remain alert! Yours in paranoia!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 4:03 PM, w.jc.pritchard at gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thx all! VPD protocol for alerts shd include a msg fr HQ to stand-down
> from alert thru initial channels, IMHO.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Kerry Porth <kerrylporth at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I haven't been able to reach Linda Malcolm today but this is the guy the
> warning was about.  I'll keep trying to confirm with the VPD.
>
> http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2015/06/09/son-arrested-in-mothers-murder/
>
> Kerry
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:01 PM, <w.jc.pritchard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Could someone please circle back with VPD and confirm with the list?
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Claire Monet <clairemonetvancouver at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Apparently he was captured this morning in Vancouver. We can all sleep a
>> little better now :)
>>
>>
>> Claire
>> xx
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 9, 2015, susan davis <susan.1968 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> thankyou everyone! another member of perb posted the filer as a photo so
>>> its been covered.
>>>
>>> and yes andrew....indoor security protocols as i described are not as
>>> good as we would like but have worked pretty well through the years....the
>>> truth is most clients are decent people and intend us no ill will....so the
>>> risk is not that high inside....however, the one who gets through...is
>>> enough to destroy a life....one is too many.....
>>>
>>> the clients are less and less willing to provide any detailed info about
>>> themselves under the new legal regime too....so the screening becomes vague
>>> questions and making the client call from the area sort of thing...
>>>
>>> i often think of nurses and other professions where people are injured
>>> or killed at a higher rate than normal....there was a study once out of
>>> UofV about just that...comparing conditions and job satisfaction i believe
>>> between sex work and other jobs...
>>>
>>> do we make those jobs illegal and more dangerous...? no
>>>
>>> we give the people working in those jobs the tools to make the safest
>>> decisions possible about their work....would we send a police officer out
>>> with a gun and no training? sink or swim as they do to sex workers...?
>>>
>>> enough ranting...
>>>
>>> love susie
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: jharthur at shaw.ca
>>> To: swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 19:28:27 -0700
>>> Subject: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>
>>> Here is a jpg Susan!  I just made it now to post on the FIRST Facebook
>>> page.
>>>
>>> Joyce
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* SWAF-Potluck [mailto:swaf-potluck-bounces at lists.resist.ca] *On
>>> Behalf Of *susan davis
>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 08, 2015 5:58 PM
>>> *To:* swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> *Subject:* Re: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> lynda made no effort to contact me....she has my email, so i don't know
>>> why she would say she tried to reach me when she didn't....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> it would be helpful if the vpd would send me the jpg file of the photo
>>> so i can upload it or post it with the warning....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> it might be more useful to know his phone number as that is the
>>> preferred mode of booking and the photo doesn't make much difference when
>>> screening by phone....it's only useful when they are at your door and then
>>> its too late....we all know how bad front door cam's are....totally
>>> blurry.....also, photo's don't help much via text or email.....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> or if they knew of aliases he used in the past etc...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> anyway, i posted it...
>>>
>>> love susie
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: kerrylporth at gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 16:51:28 -0700
>>> To: a.sorfleet at gmail.com
>>> CC: swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> Subject: Re: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>
>>> The VPD sex work liaison tried Susie but was unable to reach her.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kerry
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Andrew Sorfleet <a.sorfleet at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Great idea. Susan is on this list but i have cc 'd her as well just in
>>> case.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Claire Monet <clairemonetvancouver at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Does anyone know Susi's email?  I feel this should be posted on the
>>> Public Service Announcement section of perb which is used by a lot of
>>> workers.  I am hesitant to post it myself as he seems scary, and Susi has
>>> always been an advocate of safety.  Her perb inbox is full so I cannot
>>> reach her that way.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If anyone else wants to take the liberty of posting this I'm sure it
>>> would be helpful to reach a broader audience.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Claire
>>>
>>> xx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Kerry Porth <kerrylporth at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to be clear, this is a warning from the VPD and there is no
>>> evidence he's grown a beard and/or left the area. Speculating about him
>>> isn't helpful in terms of staying safe.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In solidarity,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kerry
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Kamile Kapel <kamilekapel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm glad to hear he's grown a beard and left the area.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Aimee Heart <aimee4heart at hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> She's right.
>>>
>>> He is (cute) and probably charming and smarter than I give him credit
>>> for.
>>>
>>> I imagine also that he has left the area, has grown a beard.
>>>
>>> (thats what I see when I look at the picture- and that is how my
>>> abilities work)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *'If criminals all look like criminals there would be none.'* -- What
>>> an officer said to me after an incident in my 20's, long long ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 18:30:07 -0700
>>> Subject: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>> From: annasmithmar at gmail.com
>>> To: chenoadj at gmail.com
>>> CC: aimee4heart at hotmail.com; swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am not so sure that he would not see somebody 'high class' or
>>> intelligent.
>>>
>>> Since I don't know him, I don't know what class he is and since he has
>>> been successfully evading the police since May 21st (after being sought in
>>> connection with his mother's murder), he is probably also intelligent.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you Google his name you will see a picture of him looking nicer (
>>> quite cute) than he does on this mugshot. Also online, some of the kids he
>>> went to high school with in Richmond said they were sorry about him; that
>>> he was a nice kid. I had been following this story since I live in
>>> Richmond, where his mother's murder took place.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just wanted to remind people that a killer might not appear evil
>>> looking, and one on the run could appear charming, esp.when looking for a
>>> place to hide, so be careful everybody !
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 6, 2015, Chenoa Johnston <chenoadj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I feel the same...
>>>
>>> And it's awesome to see the VPD Liason posting these online now.  Now
>>> for a database online of bad dates!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Aimee Heart <aimee4heart at hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>>
>>> And I doubt, we would.
>>>
>>> My senses/experience tells me a guy like this does not see high class,
>>> expensive intelligent women.
>>>
>>> I could be wrong, it's happened once before.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 08:22:36 -0700
>>> From: ohmymagdalena at gmail.com
>>> To: swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> Subject: Re: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've never seen him. Has anyone else?
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 6, 2015, Chenoa <chenoadj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Please read attached PDF ~
>>> >
>>> > From: Shakra <shakraarts at gmail.com>
>>> > Date: June 6, 2015
>>> > Subject: Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING
>>> >
>>> > From: Velvet Steele <velvet at velvetsteele.com>
>>> > Date: June 5, 2015 at 23:46:23 PDT
>>> > To: FIRST <first at cybersolidaires.org>
>>> > Subject: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>> > Reply-To: FIRST <first at cybersolidaires.org>
>>> >
>>> > I am sending this out to the list serve in the hopes that you can post
>>> where ever you may think workers will go, or do go. Let me know where you
>>> post please!
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ SWAF-Potluck mailing
>>> list SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ SWAF-Potluck mailing
>>> list SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ SWAF-Potluck mailing
>>> list SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/swaf-potluck/attachments/20150609/b769b0ba/attachment-0001.html>