[SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
w.jc.pritchard at gmail.com
w.jc.pritchard at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 16:17:15 PDT 2015
What if they arrested his doppelgänger? Until VPD issues a stand-down, I suggest remain alert! Yours in paranoia!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 4:03 PM, w.jc.pritchard at gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thx all! VPD protocol for alerts shd include a msg fr HQ to stand-down from alert thru initial channels, IMHO.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Kerry Porth <kerrylporth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't been able to reach Linda Malcolm today but this is the guy the warning was about. I'll keep trying to confirm with the VPD.
>>
>> http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2015/06/09/son-arrested-in-mothers-murder/
>>
>> Kerry
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:01 PM, <w.jc.pritchard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Could someone please circle back with VPD and confirm with the list? Thanks!
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Claire Monet <clairemonetvancouver at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Apparently he was captured this morning in Vancouver. We can all sleep a little better now :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Claire
>>>> xx
>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, June 9, 2015, susan davis <susan.1968 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> thankyou everyone! another member of perb posted the filer as a photo so its been covered.
>>>>>
>>>>> and yes andrew....indoor security protocols as i described are not as good as we would like but have worked pretty well through the years....the truth is most clients are decent people and intend us no ill will....so the risk is not that high inside....however, the one who gets through...is enough to destroy a life....one is too many.....
>>>>>
>>>>> the clients are less and less willing to provide any detailed info about themselves under the new legal regime too....so the screening becomes vague questions and making the client call from the area sort of thing...
>>>>>
>>>>> i often think of nurses and other professions where people are injured or killed at a higher rate than normal....there was a study once out of UofV about just that...comparing conditions and job satisfaction i believe between sex work and other jobs...
>>>>>
>>>>> do we make those jobs illegal and more dangerous...? no
>>>>>
>>>>> we give the people working in those jobs the tools to make the safest decisions possible about their work....would we send a police officer out with a gun and no training? sink or swim as they do to sex workers...?
>>>>>
>>>>> enough ranting...
>>>>>
>>>>> love susie
>>>>> From: jharthur at shaw.ca
>>>>> To: swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 19:28:27 -0700
>>>>> Subject: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is a jpg Susan! I just made it now to post on the FIRST Facebook page.
>>>>>
>>>>> Joyce
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: SWAF-Potluck [mailto:swaf-potluck-bounces at lists.resist.ca] On Behalf Of susan davis
>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 5:58 PM
>>>>> To: swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> lynda made no effort to contact me....she has my email, so i don't know why she would say she tried to reach me when she didn't....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> it would be helpful if the vpd would send me the jpg file of the photo so i can upload it or post it with the warning....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> it might be more useful to know his phone number as that is the preferred mode of booking and the photo doesn't make much difference when screening by phone....it's only useful when they are at your door and then its too late....we all know how bad front door cam's are....totally blurry.....also, photo's don't help much via text or email.....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> or if they knew of aliases he used in the past etc...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> anyway, i posted it...
>>>>>
>>>>> love susie
>>>>>
>>>>> From: kerrylporth at gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 16:51:28 -0700
>>>>> To: a.sorfleet at gmail.com
>>>>> CC: swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>>>
>>>>> The VPD sex work liaison tried Susie but was unable to reach her.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kerry
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Andrew Sorfleet <a.sorfleet at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Great idea. Susan is on this list but i have cc 'd her as well just in case.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Claire Monet <clairemonetvancouver at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know Susi's email? I feel this should be posted on the Public Service Announcement section of perb which is used by a lot of workers. I am hesitant to post it myself as he seems scary, and Susi has always been an advocate of safety. Her perb inbox is full so I cannot reach her that way.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If anyone else wants to take the liberty of posting this I'm sure it would be helpful to reach a broader audience.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Claire
>>>>>
>>>>> xx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Kerry Porth <kerrylporth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to be clear, this is a warning from the VPD and there is no evidence he's grown a beard and/or left the area. Speculating about him isn't helpful in terms of staying safe.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In solidarity,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kerry
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Kamile Kapel <kamilekapel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm glad to hear he's grown a beard and left the area.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Aimee Heart <aimee4heart at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> She's right.
>>>>>
>>>>> He is (cute) and probably charming and smarter than I give him credit for.
>>>>>
>>>>> I imagine also that he has left the area, has grown a beard.
>>>>>
>>>>> (thats what I see when I look at the picture- and that is how my abilities work)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 'If criminals all look like criminals there would be none.' -- What an officer said to me after an incident in my 20's, long long ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 18:30:07 -0700
>>>>> Subject: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>>> From: annasmithmar at gmail.com
>>>>> To: chenoadj at gmail.com
>>>>> CC: aimee4heart at hotmail.com; swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not so sure that he would not see somebody 'high class' or intelligent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since I don't know him, I don't know what class he is and since he has been successfully evading the police since May 21st (after being sought in connection with his mother's murder), he is probably also intelligent.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you Google his name you will see a picture of him looking nicer ( quite cute) than he does on this mugshot. Also online, some of the kids he went to high school with in Richmond said they were sorry about him; that he was a nice kid. I had been following this story since I live in Richmond, where his mother's murder took place.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just wanted to remind people that a killer might not appear evil looking, and one on the run could appear charming, esp.when looking for a place to hide, so be careful everybody !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, June 6, 2015, Chenoa Johnston <chenoadj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I feel the same...
>>>>>
>>>>> And it's awesome to see the VPD Liason posting these online now. Now for a database online of bad dates!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Aimee Heart <aimee4heart at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I doubt, we would.
>>>>>
>>>>> My senses/experience tells me a guy like this does not see high class, expensive intelligent women.
>>>>>
>>>>> I could be wrong, it's happened once before.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 08:22:36 -0700
>>>>> From: ohmymagdalena at gmail.com
>>>>> To: swaf-potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: [SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never seen him. Has anyone else?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, June 6, 2015, Chenoa <chenoadj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Please read attached PDF ~
>>>>> >
>>>>> > From: Shakra <shakraarts at gmail.com>
>>>>> > Date: June 6, 2015
>>>>> > Subject: Fwd: [FIRST] WARNING
>>>>> >
>>>>> > From: Velvet Steele <velvet at velvetsteele.com>
>>>>> > Date: June 5, 2015 at 23:46:23 PDT
>>>>> > To: FIRST <first at cybersolidaires.org>
>>>>> > Subject: [FIRST] WARNING!
>>>>> > Reply-To: FIRST <first at cybersolidaires.org>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I am sending this out to the list serve in the hopes that you can post where ever you may think workers will go, or do go. Let me know where you post please!
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________ SWAF-Potluck mailing list SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________ SWAF-Potluck mailing list SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________ SWAF-Potluck mailing list SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca
>>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/swaf-potluck/attachments/20150609/0a4e06eb/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the SWAF-Potluck
mailing list