[SWAF-Potluck] Fwd: Re: [FIRST] Government of Canada Launches On-Line Consultations to Seek Views on Criminal Code Prostitution-Related Offences

[Holly]

Just realized my earlier email about them potentially deleting responses
coming from the same computer or IP address or whatever might not have been
valid. It could be that they are allowing multiple submissions in case
people think of more things to say, or realize they left out some of their
opinions, concerns, etc.

I would just be nervous about them deleting responses that are extremely
similar and coming from the same place.

Although on the other hand, I might be over-thinking this. I don't really
believe they are going to read the responses. Didn't Justice Minister Peter
McKay already state that the government has already started writing the new
legislation?

If so, this public consultation is not really actually going to be used.
It's just a way to be able to say, well, we did consult the Canadian people
before writing these new laws!

I will still fill it out anyway and would encourage others to do so in case
it makes some difference.

Best wishes to all of you.

Holly

On Tuesday, 18 February 2014, Mary Miriam Magdalena <ohmymagdalena at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Done, once.
>
> Do you think they keep track of how many submissions come from the same
> computer or browser, internet address or whatever?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Ki Bournes <ki at massagebyki.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ki at massagebyki.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>>  Hi Everyone,
>> Please read the comments below and do the survey. At least once ;) Our
>> chance to have at least some input.
>> Ki
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: Re: [FIRST] Government of
>> Canada Launches On-Line Consultations to Seek Views on Criminal Code
>> Prostitution-Related Offences  Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:40:27 -0800  From:
>> Trina Rose <trina.rosecat at gmail.com>  Reply-To: FIRST
>> <first at cybersolidaires.org>  To: FIRST <first at cybersolidaires.org>
>>
>> I answered twice already too.
>>
>>  Trina Ricketts
>>  www.trinarose.com
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:28 PM, susan davis <susan.1968 at hotmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>  people are posting it all over canada online and people are jumping on
>> board.
>>
>>  for the record...i took the survey twice....
>>
>>  i am thinking the other side will use this to their advantage and over
>> post in favor of their goals....should we do the same? should we
>> continually answer until the deadline?
>>
>>  susie
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> From: emls at shaw.ca
>> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:32:49 -0800
>> To: first at cybersolidaires.org
>> Subject: Re: [FIRST] Government of Canada Launches On-Line Consultations
>> to Seek Views on Criminal Code Prostitution-Related Offences
>>
>>
>>  Timing interesting: they for sure knew folks were meeting last week and
>> they for sure know we're not ready. If we had any doubts, we now know they
>>  are going to push as hard and fast as they can.
>>
>>  Esther
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SWAF-Potluck mailing list
>> SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','SWAF-Potluck at lists.resist.ca');>
>> https://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swaf-potluck
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/swaf-potluck/attachments/20140219/396825f5/attachment.html>