[Shadow_Group] Fw: IS US HELPING TO ESTABLISH COMMUNISM IN IRAQ?

[Dean HICKAM]

FYI 

The same people destroying America, The Banksters, are the same ones
funding Communism and as far back as 1917 in Russia!  --  Bill

Molonlabe Email News List Molonlabe at charter.net<mailto:Molonlabe at charter.net> 
The Bald Eagle, The Bird of Freedom 
Glides , gazing, calm and sure! 

IS US HELPING TO ESTABLISH COMMUNISM IN IRAQ?
http://www.newswithviews.com/NWVexclusive/exclusive69.htm<http://www.newswithviews.com/NWVexclusive/exclusive69.htm>>http://www.news<http://www.news/>
withviews.com/NWVexclusive/exclusive69.htm 


January 3, 2005 


The Associated Press carried a story December 18, 2004 regarding the  

escalating violence in Mosul and the coming elections in Iraq. Buried in 


the article was the following comment: "Although the election campaign  

officially kicked off Wednesday, so far only the Iraqi Communist Party - 


which is part of the U.S.-installed interim government - was known to
have  

had a public gathering." 


Several individuals contacted NWVs about this and expressed their outrage
 

that our soldiers are being sent to die in a foreign country to establish
 

communism. Hank Goller is a Viet Nam veteran who commented, "It's not bad
 

enough that Bush invaded a foreign country without a formal declaration
of  

war built on a mountain of lies, but now we find out our fighting
brothers  

are dying to install communism? This whole (expletive) government is
rotten  

beyond redemption." (search) 


Cliff (last name withheld by request) served in the first Gulf War under 


Bush, Sr. and was "appalled" not only because "America got sucked into
this  

war based on a bunch of lies," but knowing his fellow soldiers were over 


there away from their families and getting shot and killed to set up  

communism "frosts my windows right up." He added, "It's not the  

responsibility of the United States to set up any government in a foreign
 

country nor are their elections any of our business. This whole thing has
 

gotten totally out of hand." 


Historically, 'nation building' has never been successful and the general
 

consensus is that no matter how much money or bodies President Bush ships
 

to Afghanistan and Iraq, failure will be the end result. "Nation-building
 

is thus grossly unsuitable as a tool to combat terrorism, or the
religious  

fundamentalism that drives it. An America that takes on the task of  

rebuilding the many failed or failing nations around the world will drive
 

itself into bankruptcy and will find itself struggling against the same  

insecurity and combating the same forces that it encountered on 9/11,"
said  

Subodh Atal. 


Atal is the author of a recent Cato Institute Foreign Policy Briefing,
"At  

a Crossroads in Afghanistan: Should the United States be
Nation-Building?"  

He also went on to say on November 23, 2003, "Rumsfeld's candid comments 


suggest that some in the administration have doubts about whether the  

terrorist threat can be neutralized by billions of dollars in foreign
aid.  

President Bush should be equally candid with the American people. He
should  

explain that we won't be able to bribe away international terrorism, and
he  

should refuse to authorize any more resources for counter-productive  

nation-building." 


In a July 11, 2004 commentary, Morton Abramowitz and Heather Hurlburt 

pointed out in a Washington Post article, July 11, 2004, the following:
"No  

fewer than nine times over the past decade, Western powers have deployed 


noble rhetoric, soldiers and taxpayer dollars in the service of  

nation-building. And no fewer than nine times, they have, to one degree
or  

another, failed to build stable, self-sustaining nations." 


There is no authorization in Art. 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution
for  

foreign aid or money from the people's treasury to be used for building
new  

schools, roads, towns, airports and other facilities in any foreign  

country. The cost of the war in Iraq is currently running $5.4 billion  

dollars a day. There is no money in the U.S. Treasury so the money being 


spent will have to be borrowed from the privately owned Federal Reserve
and  

added to the growing national debt. 


Jeri Lynn Ball, author of Masters of Seduction and Time Bomb, sets forth 


the following in her opinion as the reason behind these endless conflicts
 

and the "war on terrorism": 


"The definition of the term: "War of National Liberation": To achieve its
 

goals of constant expansion and ultimate world domination, the Soviet
Union 

has worked to "incite" and arm 'liberation wars,' guerrilla movements,  

[and] subversion" in the West. Again, the CFR-dominated Clinton/Bush  

Administrations and the Communist Chinese have cooperated in this massive
 

effort to attack and destroy the Western way of life. Ray S. Cline and  

Yonah Alexander write, "A succession of major victories in regional  

'liberation' conflicts would in time change the balance of power  

irreversibly, presaging Communist triumph in the end." 


"Warmongering Communist criminals, who have waged a war of aggression  

against the West and who aim to achieve world domination, pose as the  

law-abiding, peace-loving liberators of mankind. Martin Ebon says that  

Vladimir Bukovski left the USSR in 1976 to live in England. Bukovski
quoted  

Lenin as saying: "As an ultimate objective, peace simply means Communist 


world control..." Bukovski explained further: "We must at the same time  

bear in mind that wars are the 'inevitable consequence of the clash of  

imperialist interests under capitalism,' and therefore they will continue
 

to be inevitable as long as capitalism exists. The only way to save  

humanity from the evil of wars, then, is to 'liberate' it from the
'chains  

of capitalism.'" In the Communist view, the world can only be liberated  

from "evil of wars" through "just wars." Lyons observes that the
Communists  

"always specifiy support for 'just' wars, so-called wars of liberation -
in  

fact, those "conflicts" instigated or sanctioned by Communists.
Khrushechev  

stated: "The communists fully support just wars." 


"On April 5, 2003, President Bush spoke about the war in Iraq and the  

advance of American and coalition forces. Just as the infamous Soviet  

dictator Nikita Khrushchev reaffirmed Communist support for "just" wars,
so  

President Bush said, "By our actions...we serve a...just cause." Carrying
 

forward Lenin's and Stalin's program for Communist global control, the
Bush  

Administration and its Russian and Chinese Communist allies seek to  

"liberate" humanity from the "chains of capitalism." Like Stalin, they
aim  

to conduct their war on various "fronts" and, now, upon entering the  

"second phase" of this war, they plan to arm and incite "liberation wars"
 

for humanity in other countries. 


"On March 10, 1939, Stalin said, "...we shall be in a position to move
from  

the first phase of Communism to the second phase. To do this, there must
be  

an indomitable desire to go forward and a readiness to make sacrifices." 


Following Lenin's lead, Stalin armed and incited "wars of national  

liberation." On April 30, 2002, President Bush said, "...America 

has...accepted a great challenge in the world: to wage a relentless and  

systematic campaign against global terror...We are in for a long and  

difficult war. It will be conducted on many fronts. In the first phase of
 

our military operation, American and coalition forces - have liberated - 


the people of Afghanistan from a barbaric regime...We have entered the
next  

phase of the war." On April 3, 2003, Mr. Bush echoed Stalin's call for "a
 

readiness to make sacrifices" when he said, "These are sacrifices in a
high  

calling..." 


The fact that the U.S. government is financing the establishment of  

communism in Iraq is sure to cause even more controversy in the future. 




  

*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,  
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use  
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest 
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and
educational purposes only.[Ref.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml<http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml> ] 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20050109/ad8fad33/attachment.html>