[Shadow_Group] Fw: Plans To Scrap WTC

[shadowgroup-l at lists.resist.ca]

rense.com

Plans To Scrap WTC 
Towers For $5.6 Bn In 1989!
>From Karl W. B. Schwarz
kw.schwarz at worldnet.att.net<mailto:kw.schwarz at worldnet.att.net>
12-6-4
 
To Jimmy Walter 
  
Hi Jimmy, your comment completely misses the point. 
  
That is why, in 1989, they planned a $5.6 billion takedown and rebuild,
it was tanked. 
  
The witness came to me...and we are protecting them. 
  
The building had the structural equivalent of osteoporosis. 
  
I am about to fund $25-50 million to THE LAWSUIT - United States Citizens
v United States Government. Something major happened over the past
several days. 
  
Karl 
  
-----Original Message----- 
  
From: Jimmy Walter 
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:49 PM 
To: 'Karl W. B. Schwarz' 
Subject: RE: galvanic versus flying beams 
  
No amount of galvanic action will hurl steel beams straight out
horizontally and cause the building to fall at the speed of gravity.
However, it would be cause for insurance fraud! 
But keep trying 
  
_____ 
  
From: Karl W. B. Schwarz 
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:22 PM 
To: Jimmy Walter 
  
Hello Jimmy 
  
You are going to wind up owing me the $100,000. :-) 
  
The Statute of Liberty had to be repaired due to galvanic corrosion in
air. Not what most think is possible but in ocean environments, very
possible. Normally galvanic corrosion is only a factor in an electrolyte
such as sea water and the stern drive on the boat - having steel and
aluminum components - erodes, turns brittle and snap - it fails - if
electrolytic grounding plates are not installed. 
  
  
"""The galvanic reaction between iron and copper was originally mitigated
by insulating copper from the iron framework using an asbestos cloth
soaked in shellac. However, the integrity and sealing property of this
improvised insulator broke down over the many years of exposure to high
levels of humidity normal in a marine environment. The insulating barrier
became a sponge that kept the salted water present as a conductive
electrolyte, forming a crude electrochemical cell as Volta had discovered
a century earlier.""" 
  
  
In 1989 - there were plans to erect scaffolding and disassemble the WTC
towers and rebuild them. Cost projection was around $5.6 billion. One of
the architects shows up to work one day and the MIB's were there - had
confiscated all of the plans, specs, details, etc for WTC. They even
confiscated their office cubicles and had tape on the floor outlining
where they went. 
  
Reason - the exterior cast aluminum WTC panels had been directly
connected to the steel superstructure of the building, thus causing
galvanic corrosion. In short, the "life cycle" of the WTC was not 200 -
300 years, more like 30 years or so. 
  
The exterior skin of the building - in being aluminum and connected
directly to the super structure - was making the building weaker every
day. 
  
That could explain why there appears to be explosives set only about
every 25 floors. Once the failure started, the brittleness of welds,
rivets, bolts, etc would fail much easier as the loads became
progressively greater on the way down. 
  
That same process would also explain why the concrete was "powderized"
over time because electrolytic processes weaken concrete too by
"debonding" the Portland that causes concrete to bond in the first place.
However, bear in mind that the "concrete floors" were not load bearing
reinforced concrete. They were supported by what was a weakening by the
day superstructure and cross members. 
  
There was a 1989 meeting and the folks at the architectural firm [Emory
Roth, the project architect that took over after the design architects
completed the conceptual drawings] that had their office, records, plans
and specs seized - were told that the $5.6 billion "take it down, rebuild
it" project was cancelled and in about "10-12 years" they would "blow it
up and start over". Consider that - and consider that NYC and the US Govt
could not stand the global embarrassment of being so stupid or negligent
that they did not consider the effects of galvanic corrosion on the
superstructure. That is structural design 101 in architectural school and
why they want architects to take physics and chemistry for Christ's sake.
I did. 
  
I am an architect by the way, quit practicing in 1988. 
  
http://www.npl.co.uk/ncs/docs/the_electochemistry_of_corrosion_figures.pd<http://www.npl.co.uk/ncs/docs/the_electochemistry_of_corrosion_figures.pd>
f 
  
http://www.npl.co.uk/ncs/docs/the_electochemistry_of_corrosion.pdf<http://www.npl.co.uk/ncs/docs/the_electochemistry_of_corrosion.pdf> 
  
http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/galvdefi.htm<http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/galvdefi.htm> see bimetallic
corrosion to get to the two links above 
  
http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Landmarks/statue-saddle.htm<http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Landmarks/statue-saddle.htm> 
  
Guess what? 
  
The fat lady HAS SUNG. You know, the one in New York Harbor with the
torch of Liberty and Freedom held high. 
  
I want to find the sick bastard that thought it would be a cute idea to
have close to 3,000 in the building and use that as an excuse to go take
on a whole new energy policy, war policy, and lining the pockets of just
certain people. 
  
I think a Statute of Liberty hanging for that person would be most
appropriate. 
  
best regards, 
  
Karl W. B. Schwarz 
President, Chief Executive Officer 
Patmos Nanotechnologies, LLC

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041213/19d41d7b/attachment.html>