[Shadow_Group] Fw: ARAFAT, THE KAPO

[shadowgroup-l at lists.resist.ca]

THE HOFFMAN WIRE 
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and
Revisionist History
 
Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subscribe at topica.com<mailto:HoffmanWire-subscribe at topica.com>
 
Michael A. Hoffman II, Editor
 
November 11, 2004 
 
ARAFAT, THE KAPO
 
by Michael A. Hoffman II
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wire10.html<http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wire10.html>
 
Kapo. Definition: 1. individuals who have been recruited by an enemy to 
police their own people; "Kameradenpolizei."
 
The late Yasir Arafat was the Israelis' dream leader for the 
Palestinians: immensely corrupt and incompetent, he ran the Palestinian 
cause to ground with his naive faith in America as an "honest broker" in 
the Middle East.
 
Arafat's first name seems to have derived from the fact that he went 
around the Israelis and Americans so often muttering, "Yassir, Boss," 
just as the next "Palestinian President" will be required to do if he 
wants to live past next month.
 
The only meaningful, defiant stand Arafat ever took-- and even that was 
done mainly under pressure from militants-- was to refuse the 
Barak/Clinton "generous offer" at Camp David in 2000, which would have 
given the Palestinian seal of approval to the dreadful state of affairs 
that evolved under Sharon: the carving of the occupied territories into 
disconnected Bantustans and the repudiation of the "right of return" of 
hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees, now living miserable 
lives in camps in Jordan under the CIA-linked Jordanian monarchy.
 
Any such deal cut with Ehud Barak would be particularly odious since 
Barak is one of the most despicable Israeli terrorists and assassins. In 
1994, as military chief, Barak massacred Palestinian demonstrators in 
the course of disturbances in the wake of the now nearly-forgotten 
slaughter of 40 Palestinian civilians by an off-duty Israeli army 
officer from Brooklyn, Baruch Goldstein. Barak actually killed more 
Palestinians during the protests than Goldstein had at the mosque.
 
The source of Arafat's rise to power is murky. As the perfect 
Palestinian foil to the Israelis, after the demise of the USSR Arafat 
was always looking to a US President or the United Nations to save him 
and his people. When George W. Bush proved to be as much of a Likud 
lunatic as Sharon, Arafat's mantra became, "the international community" 
(i.e. western Europe).
 
Europe, the UN and the White House were foremost on Arafat's list of 
Palestinian allies. Strangely absent was the Arab League, the Saudis, 
Egypt, Jordan or any other Arab country. With the sole exception of the 
non-Arab Islamic Republic of Iran, the Muslim nations were absolutely 
impotent and stood by in disgrace as Peres, Shamir, Netanyahu, Barak and 
Sharon did whatever they liked to the Palestinians, machine-gunning, 
rocketing and bombing elderly grandmothers, infants and children, 
mothers and fathers with the insouciance of Saturday afternoon plinkers 
at a carnival shooting gallery.
 
In the end, Arafat was no longer needed by the Israelis, and Sharon 
confined him to his quarters like a recalcitrant schoolboy, while 
figuring out a way to have him killed without risking the ire of Colin 
Powell, who regarded the assassination in broad daylight of a 
head-of-state, with American-financed weapons and munitions, a bit 
excessive.
 
So dominant are the Israelis now that they don't need a "Palestinian 
peace partner," just a kapo to administer on their behalf the enormous 
concentration camp that is Gaza and the West Bank, behind a front of 
Palestinian nationalism. Any other successor to Arafat, any Palestinian 
patriot who truly represents the legitimate aspirations of his people 
for independence, will very likely be assassinated by Sharon as an 
"al-Qaeda connected terrorist" (the same risible charge that Likudniks, 
Fox TV and conservative talk radio hosts in the US have made in 
connection with Arafat, who was despised by radical Islamic militants 
everywhere--including Hamas-- who did not make war on him solely in 
order to avoid falling into the contrived trap of Palestinian civil war, 
which the Israeli chess players had so dearly sought to provoke).
 
The bin Ladens of the world are no alternative of course. Their mime of 
US and Israeli terrorism plays directly into the hands of the Mossad and 
the CIA, if indeed they are not actually agents of those intelligence 
agencies, as seems likely.
 
The dominant Judeo-Masonic system in the West today, which I style the 
Cryptocracy, loves terrorism, incites it and feeds upon it like a 
vampire at a blood bank. Conversely, what the Cryptocracy hates and 
fears is an enemy that would behave like the old Sicilian Mafia, 
confining its warfare to soldiers only, leaving all women and children 
unharmed. The resulting contrast between Israeli contempt for Arab 
civilians ("Amalek" in Talmudic theology, no matter what Uri Avnery 
continues to pretend in this regard), and the conduct of a new Saladin, 
who would exhibit the highest ideals of nobility in warfare, could shake 
the West off its foundations.
 
Alas, this is not on the horizon, because al-Qaeda is too convenient a 
stage dummy for the Western ventriloquists, who can run this shadowy 
public relations operation by means of virtual reality videotapes seeded 
to al-Jazeera satellite television, even as the corrupt Arab states fall 
ever deeper in thrall to US cash and threats, and their own penchant for 
wallowing in oil riches in the midst of Palestinian and Iraqi misery.
 
The Arab world desperately needs reform and revolution, but the idea 
that such positive change will come from US occupation is a neo-con 
horse-laugh. In spite of all the attention on the murder of Dutch 
filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, who criticized alleged Islamic misogyny, no 
furious indignation anywhere in the West is observed in connection with 
the near fatal beating administered to Professor Robert Faurisson in 
France in 1989, because he wrote essays casting doubt on homicidal gas 
chambers in Auschwitz. Before him, Francois Duprat, also a professor, 
was killed in France for harboring similar doubts. Yet so amnesiac is 
Europe when it comes to the crimes of Judaic religious fanatics against 
critics of its sacred lore, that the assault on Van Gogh is being 
described as unprecedented.
 
Dozens of other dissenters, like publisher Ernst Zundel, researcher Jean 
Plantin, schoolteacher Jurgen Graf, Max Planck chemist Germar Rudolf, 
film maker Vincent Reynouard and historian David Irving, have been 
banned or prosecuted in Canada, Australia, and Europe for anti-Zionist 
thought crimes, with virtually no outcry from the intelligentsia of the 
West, who mount an enormous hue-and-cry over the outrage in Holland, 
chiefly as a pretext for weakening the power of Zionism's Islamic 
nemesis.
 
According to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz (Nov. 4, 2004), Israeli 
Justice Minister Tommy Lapid supports legislation in the Knesset calling 
for any "Holocaust denier" anywhere in the world to be tried in Israel: 
"Lapid told Haaretz that he feels denying the Holocaust 'is a clearly 
neo-Nazi crime. Anyone involved in this belongs to the group of 
criminals whom our arm must reach anywhere in the world."
 
This outrageous declaration of inquistion and religious fanaticism from 
a state possessing the atomic bomb -- threatening to kidnap scholars who 
doubt the religious axioms of Holocaustianity-- just doesn't strike a 
chord with those trendy liberals and crusading Conservatives who weep 
and wail over the "ravages of Islamic fanaticism" among the Dutch. This 
is because their real issue is not free speech. If it were, WWII 
revisionists would be protected, not prosecuted. The real issue is the 
continued stoking of western hatred for Islam in order to foment a World 
War III "clash of civilizations" for the salvation of the tiny bandit 
state of "Israel." 
 
To publish books and tapes that "deny the Nazi Holocaust" in Iraq, under 
US rule, is now a criminal offense ("incitement' as the Israelis term 
it). Hence, for anti-Zionists, there is less freedom of speech in Iraq 
under the US than under Saddam. Bush recently signed into law a 
heresy-hunting measure that empowers the US government to track 
intellectuals and publications throughout the world that are skeptical 
of the gas chamber stories, as a prelude to the arrest and prosecution 
of these doubters.
 
In a growing number of cases, Islamic youth are becoming aware of this 
hypocritical double-standard and they are gaining a working knowledge of 
the fact that the advancement of "western democracy" is little more than 
a code-word for the imposition of supremacist standards of immunity and 
privilege for Zionist lies and hoaxes, and for the Judaic religion that 
holds one group of people superior to all others.
 
While it is true that Arafat engaged in the requisite armed resistance 
("terrorism" when Muslims do it, "heroic combat" when Judaic "partisans" 
perpetrated it during World War II); that was part of the game too.
 
Sagacious, humane western counselors who have had any role in advising 
the Palestinians, such as Israel Shahak, have urged them to use only the 
tactics of Gandhi against the Israelis: boycotts, strikes, marches, 
protests, pickets. The tactic of kamikaze bombings and the Talmudic-like 
identification of Israeli civilians as legitimate targets, has been a 
disaster for Palestinians, in spite of the fact that Israeli terrorism 
has been far more widespread and deadly by a ratio of three-to-one.
 
Perhaps the root of the problem is in Islam's emphasis on combat as an 
oppressed people's ultimate expression of self-defense and masculinity. 
If for every Kalashnikov, the Palestinians were given a 
relatively-inexpensive Canon GL1 digital mini camcorder, and if for an 
underground bomb-making factory, the Palestinians substituted a 
fortified iMac-Final Cut Pro-video production bunker, coordinating the 
videotape that had been filmed of Israeli atrocities throughout the 
occupied territories, the Zionists would be exposed today for 
perpetrating a slow-motion holocaust, as only an independent media in an 
Internet age can expose them. The Western Establishment media, no matter 
how "progressive," has not done it yet and is unlikely to do so at 
anytime in the near future.
 
The Palestinians are foolish for waiting for Robert Fisk or the 
Manchester Guardian newspaper to perform this exposure for them. Most 
Leftist critics of Zionism--even the most radical among them-- refuse to 
call Israeli atrocities a holocaust, and they either approve of or are 
indifferent to the repression against revisionist doubters of the gas 
chambers, while believing that orthodox Judaism and the Talmud are noble 
in their essence when not "distorted" by Zionism. 
 
These delusions are fatal to any movement seeking to overcome the 
Judeo-masonic empire and its brilliant Hegelian chess play, with its 
covert manipulation of antagonists and protagonists who often bear a 
symbiotic relationship to one another, as Arafat did to the Israeli 
leadership, and as Osama bin Laden does to George W. Bush.
 
Revolution is an all-or-nothing proposition. It cannot afford to 
incorporate the contradictions of a western petty bourgeoisie still 
enamored of Judaism, the Talmud and the myths of Allied benevolence in 
World War II. Such people carry a spiritual virus; all the while they 
are allying themselves to the Palestinian cause. 
 
The genocide against the Palestinians should have long-ago alerted the 
western intelligentsia to the exterminationist nature of Judaism and 
Zionism. 
 
The true "clash of civilizations" is between the remnant of actual 
followers of Jesus Christ, and the suzerainty of the Pharisee creed of 
Judaism, which the modern West, be it Left or Right, progressive or 
conservative, continues to appease, flatter and finance.
 
When the new Saladin arrives on the scene, he will know these truths and 
act on them. Until then, Arabs and Muslims will have for their leaders 
ever more Kameradenpolizei, in the Arafat mold. 
 
This column is online at:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wire10.html<http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wire10.html>
 
Books authored or co-authored by Michael Hoffman:
 
"The Israeli Holocaust Against the Palestinians"
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=125<http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=125>
 
"Judaism's Strange Gods" 
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=83<http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=83>
 
>>>>>>>>>>
 
The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research,
Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA 
 
24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/news.html<http://www.revisionisthistoryorg/news.html>
 
Subscribe:  HoffmanWire-subscribe at topica.com<mailto:HoffmanWire-subscribe at topica.com>
 
Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect
e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it.  We have a
strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are
the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of
advertisers or the transmitter. 
 
Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right.
Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041113/cf75f66a/attachment.html>