[Shadow_Group] OKC bombing

shadowgroup-l at lists.resist.ca shadowgroup-l at lists.resist.ca
Tue Oct 19 00:05:05 PDT 2004


           
            THE EXECUTION OF A GOVERNMENT PATSY<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/mcveigh_patsy.htm> 
            THE SECRETS OF TIMOTHY McVEIGH <http://www.apfn.org/apfn/mcveigh_secrets.htm>

            According to his death certificate, Timothy McVeigh died a soldier.<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_soldier.htm>

            Deathbed confession implicates USG withholding 
            of key evidence in OKC bombing case<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_confession.htm>

            Oklahoma City Bombing<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/oklahoma.htm>

            Weeks Before 1995 Oklahoma Bombing, Government Warned of Possible Terror 
            Attacks<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_warned.htm>

            Victims' Mother Asks Why No ATF Were Killed in Bombing <http://www.apfn.org/OKC/atf.htm>

            Bombing sent grandmother on long quest<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/grandmother.htm>

            CHANDRA LEVY: UNRAVELING GOVERNMENT COVERUPS?<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/chandra_levy.htm>


            Those Who Died
            The 168 Lives Lost on April 19, 1995.<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/died.htm>

            Was FBI early arrival in OKC?<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/arrival.htm>

            Unresolved Deaths in OKC<http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b2804310d68.htm>

            WHO KILLED TERRY YEAKEY?<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/yeakey.htm>

            The big bad wolf is dead?<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/wolf.htm>

            Lead in Oklahoma Bombing<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_lead.htm>

            McVeigh's death certificate<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_soldier.htm>

            Open letter to John Ashcroft<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ashcroft.htm>



            JOHN ASHCROFT AND THE OKC BOMBING 
            Devvy Kidd/February 8, 2001<http://www.constitution.org/okc/jdt01-04.htm>

            Did A Lawsuit Stop McVeigh's Execution?<http://www.inlibertyandfreedom.com/mcveigh.htm>

            Open letter to John Ashcroft<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ashcroft.htm>

            The Murrah Building Cover-up (literally).<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok.html>

            UPDATE: Oklahoma Bombing Cover-Up<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_update.htm>

            Jane Graham Information<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/graham.htm>

            "High Explosives" WHICH HAD A TIMER ON IT<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/timer.htm>

            Oklahoma Bombing Affidavits: Additional Bomb<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/add_bomb.htm>

            Experts say Murrah Building damage not done by truck blast alone<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/plastic.htm>



            "John Doe #2 Identified: But Can We Get The FBI To Arrest Him?"<http://www.xld.com/public/jdt/jdindx1.htm>

            OKC Bombing ~ What Is The Government Hiding<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okcbomb.htm>

            Air Force Photos and JANE GRAHAM<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc.htm>

            Fed Implicated in OKC Bombing<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fed.htm>

            Mind Control & Timothy McVeigh's Rise from "Robotic" Soldier to Mad Bomber<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fed.htm>

            Secret Pentagon Report on Oklahoma City Bombing--Evidence of an Inside Job?<http://www.aci.net/kalliste/okcbomb.htm>

            OKC BOMBING WAS VIA EM BEAM WEAPON!!!<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/beam.htm>

            THE NEW AMERICAN: Oklahoma City Bombing<http://www.thenewamerican.com/focus/okc/index.htm>

            INSIDE THE NEW OKLAHOMA CITY FBI DOCUMENTS<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/doc.htm>

            Lawsuit filed for stay of execution for Tim McVeigh<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/filed.htm>

            ELOHIM, TERROR, AND TRUTH<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/truth.htm>

            DREAM BUST OF THE CENTURY<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/century.htm>

            Fed Informant Documents Treason in OKC Bombing<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/treason.htm>

            Experts also say the way the Murrah building fell....<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/experts.htm>

            Blowing the Lid Off the O.K. City Bomb<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/lid_off.htm>

            Third Suspect Identified in Oklahoma Bombing<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/third.htm>

            The McVeigh aftermath<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/aftermath.htm>

            Oklahoma Bombing Grand Jury Loses Credibility <http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/government/grand_jury02-99.html>

            FBI Scandals and Death Threat Bring No Closure <http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/government/oklahoma_trial01-98.html>

            The Oklahoma Bombing <http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/arc_features/government/okc10-97.html>

            Timothy McVeigh Convicted but Jury is Still Out<http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/war/oklahoma6-97.html>

            Many, Many Questions Still Haunt Oklahoma<http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/war/a121296c.html>

            The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror<http://www.constitution.org/ocbpt/ocbpt.htm>

            OKC Bombing- Death of a Hero: Terry Yeakey- Part II<http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a425207.htm>


            Police Officer Murdered to cover up OKC Bombing<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_officer.htm>

            UNRESOLVED DEATHS IN OKLAHOMA<http://www.rense.com/general11/unresolved.htm>

            OKC Murders<http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword05s.htm>

            OKC Blast Linked To Bin Laden - FBI Refused To 
            Accept Evidence<http://www.rense.com/general9/laden.htm>

            Government's Prior Knowledge <http://www.aci.net/kalliste/okckey.htm>

            Oklahoma City Bombing Update - An e-mail I recieved<http://members.tripod.com/~bmakowski/p21.html>

            OKC Trial Transcripts
            Terry Nichols<http://www.courttv.com/casefiles/oklahoma/nichtranscripts/1104am.html>

            What You Won't Hear In The News!!<http://members.tripod.com/~Not2Good/bombing.html>

            CHANDRA LEVY: UNRAVELING GOVERNMENT COVERUPS?<http://apfn.org/apfn/chandra_levy.htm>

             
             Site search Web search
             
            powered by FreeFind<http://www.freefind.com/>


           
      OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING COVER-UP

      <http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_motel.htm>

      http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_motel.htm<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_motelhtm> 

      "WE ARE APT TO SHUT OUR EYES AGAINST A PAINFUL TRUTH... 
      FOR MY PART, I AM WILLING TO KNOW THE WHOLE TRUTH; TO KNOW THE
      WORST; AND TO PROVIDE FOR IT." ---- Patrick Henry
      http://www.apfn.org<http://www.apfn.org/> 



      The Middle Eastern connection to Oklahoma City
      http://www.apfn.org/OKC/middle_eastern.htm<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/middle_eastern.htm> 


      OKC Blast Linked To bin Laden-FBI Refused To Accept Evidence
      http://educate-yourself.org/nwobinladenokcbomblink21mar01.html<http://educate-yourself.org/nwobinladenokcbomblink21mar01.html> 



      Execution Eye Witness - Susan Carlson, Media Witness: 4 min. 27 sec. "he appeared to be still breathing or what appeared to be shallow breathing, even after being pronounced dead and his eyes remained open".
      Windows Media Player) - See and hear this first. Execution Eye Witness
      http://www.apfn.org/movies/mcveigh-lives.WMV<http://www.apfn.org/movies/mcveigh-lives.WMV>     

      <http://okcbombing.org/>
      http://okcbombing.org/<http://okcbombing.org/>  

      To Order the " Final    Report" on the 
      OKC bombing:   Call toll-free 800-334-5597 
      Update:     Check News Update<http://web.archive.org/web/20011024224126/okcbombing.org/index.htm>   for more information. 
      Any questions,  email:   info at okcbombing.org<mailto:info at okcbombing.org>

      For more information write to: 
      Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee 
      PO Box 75697 
      Oklahoma City, OK   73147 

      [[We bought this book "Final Report" and highly recommend it!]]

      Transcript of the Press Conference
      http://www.apfn.org/OKC/press.htm<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/press.htm> 

      The Terrance (Terry) Yeakey Incident
      Terrance (Terry) Yeakey was a courageous young black Oklahoma City police officer who was on duty near the Murrah Building the morning of that building's bombing. Officer Yeakey entered the bombed out Murrah building and saw things that apparently caused him to be murdered. The hideous details are within these audio tapes
      Part 1 http://www.apfn.org/audio/tyeakey1.rm<http://www.apfn.org/audio/tyeakey1.rm>    
      Part 2 http://www.apfn.org/audio/tyeakey2.rm<http://www.apfn.org/audio/tyeakey2.rm> 

      M.L. Montgomery wrote in message 35A0E386.2CAD563 at swbell.net...
      I don't know about this story, however Officer Yeakey was a DARE officer
      for Mustang (Oklahoma) Schools in addition to being involved in the
      Murrah Building Bombing rescue efforts. My son was one of his students
      and Officer Yeakey had a *profound* effect on him and the other
      students. Many of his DARE students attended his funeral and all,
      including my son, received counseling. Our understanding was that
      Officer Yeakey, despondent over the break-up of his marriage and
      suffering post-traumatic stress from his role in the bombing, took his
      own life.
      http://groups.google.com/groups?ic=1&selm=35A2E846.2440A0@lr.net<http://groups.google.com/groups?ic=1&selm=35A2E846.2440A0@lr.net> 

      Suspicious Deaths

      In the first minutes and hours following the blasts that devastated the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City, the morning of April 19, 1995, a number of selfless individuals risked life and limb to rescue many of the victims. Among them were Oklahoma City police officers, Terrance Yeakey, Gordon Martin and Ken Griffin, a number of Oklahoma City firefighters, Dr. H. Don Chumley, G.S.A. employee Mike Loudenslager and others.
      http://groups.google.com/groups?ic=1&selm=cNVu4.253$JY.490@pravda.msen.com<http://groups.google.com/groups?ic=1&selm=cNVu4.253$JY.490@pravda.msen.com>

      DAVID KULKENDORFER (Oklahoma County Sheriff's Reserve Deputy): 
      Excerpt:
      Well, later on, during the evening, a lot of public officials started to show up. The mayor showed up with a contingency, and the district attorney, the governor, and several dignitaries. I was standing approximately in front of the Water Resources Building, to try to keep people out and watching the search and rescue. As I looked to my left, I could see Congressman Istook kind of working his way east to west. Well, he worked his way up to me and he stopped to my left and introduced himself and we kind of small-talked a little bit about, "How's everything? It's a bad, bad, bad deal." And he made the comment to me, he says, "Yeah, we knew this was going to happen." And I said, "Excuse me?" And he says, "Yeah, we knew this was going to happen. We got word through our sources that there is a radical fundamental Islamic group in Oklahoma City and that they were going to bomb the federal building."
      http://www.apfn.org/OKC/ISTOOK1.TXT<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/ISTOOK1.TXT>     



      USA vs TERRY LYNN NICHOLS
       <http://www.apfn.org/Movies/okc2.avi>okc2.wmv<http://www.apfn.org/Movies/okc2.WMV>

       





         


      The following .pdf documents were sent to APFN
      to upload for Public viewing, Compliments of
      MR. HARMON L. TAYLOR 
      P O BOX 516104
      DALLAS, TX 75251 
      Phone: (214) 361-0401 
      Fax: (214) 361-0306 
      State Bar of Texas
      Appellate Section
      http://www.tex-app.org/bylast.php?firstletter=T<http://www.tex-app.org/bylast.php?firstletter=T> 

      ####

      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/brief.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/brief.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/whywebother.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/whywebother.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/letter.html<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/letter.html> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/ohreally.html<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/ohreally.html> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/CoverSheet.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/CoverSheetpdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/SummonsLappin.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/SummonsLappin.pdf> 

      Notation for the following document:

      It may make perfect, intuitive sense why Lappin is the Defendant.

      It may not be quite so clear why the State AG is also named, and as a 
      Necessary Party. It's in the pleadings, but let me address that here, 
      briefly.

      Land ownership in the "constitutional Government" depends upon a couple 
      of things, both of which are found in Article I, section 8, clause 17. 
      First, there must be evidence of transfer of title to the property, such 
      as by a Deed, and secondly, there must be Consent by the State 
      Legislature of the State in which the property is found.

      For the Murrah Building, neither of these forms of evidence of ownership 
      in the "constitutional Government" have ever shown up; not in the deed 
      records, not in the legislative records, not in either trial (McVeigh or 
      Nichols). Therefore, it is safe to conclude that these documents don't 
      exist regarding the Murrah Building.

      Conclusion: The land on which stood the Murrah Building was never owned 
      by the "constitutional Government."

      If the distinction between the "federal government" and the 
      "constitutional Government" is a topic for which additional information 
      would be helpful, I can also send my "Dissertations on Definitions" page 
      from legalreality.com, which explores, in some detail, what the term 
      "federal" means. In sum, "federal" means "federal." It doesn't mean 
      "national." It most certainly doesn't mean "constitutional." "Federal" 
      has everything to do with private obligations and nothing to do with the 
      Constitution. The "federal government" does not arise from the 
      Constitution, which also means that the Constitution is not the language 
      by which we can limit the "federal government."

      The fact that the Murrah Building and that property are characterized, 
      and properly so, as a "federal enclave" is the confession that it is, in 
      fact, private property.

      Apply this line of thought one more time. As it turns out, the property 
      on which sits the "United States" Penitentiary in Terre Haute also has a 
      flagrant problem with title, from the point of view of the Constitution. 
      Thanks to excellent and very much appreciated assistance in Indiana, we 
      were able to locate a deed transferring title "to the United States of 
      America, or its successors," for that property. However, and also thanks 
      to excellent and very much appreciated assistance in Indiana, in 
      particular through the Notre Dame School of Law library, we were 
      completely unable to locate any act by the State Legislature in Indiana 
      "consenting" to that transfer of title. Therefore, we know that the 
      "constitutional Government" never owned that property, either. And, 
      again, the proper characterization of that property's being a "federal 
      enclave" is the confession that it, too, is private property.

      Here's the legal consequence of these conclusions. Since this property 
      is not owned by the "constitutional Government," that makes it property 
      that is subject to the authority of the "state." And, since we cannot 
      find any formal business organizational documents telling us that the 
      "United States" Penitentiary in Terre Haute is a "for profit" business 
      enterprise, we must presume the possibility that it is a "not for 
      profit" business enterprise.

      When a "not for profit" business entity gets sued, it is the traditional 
      rule that the AG of the "state" must be included as a Necessary Party, 
      especially in matters sounding in equity, which this one most certainly 
      did. The reason is that the "state" AG is a necessary party to all suits 
      involving public charitable trusts, and if the "state" AG is not 
      included, then the entire matter can be dismissed at the whim of the AG, 
      at practically any stage, including post-judgment, based solely on 
      failure of proper notice to the "state" AG. Some "states" may have rules 
      that vary some from this, but this is the traditional gist of the matter.

      In sum, because, through a "no evidence" line of proof, we CAN establish 
      that the "United States" Penitentiary in Terre Haute is not sitting on 
      property owned by the "constitutional Government," we know that it is a 
      business entity subject to the authority of the State of Indiana. That 
      being the case, and not having affirmative proof that it is, in fact, a 
      "for profit" business enterprise, of some organizational structure or 
      other, the question arises that it very well may be a public charitable 
      trust, and if that's the case, then the Indiana AG is a necessary party 
      to the suit.

      The Indiana AG's Office never provided proof, one way or the other, as 
      to any Consent by the Indiana Legislature or of the "for profit," or 
      "not for profit," character of that Penitentiary. So, we still don't 
      know, for certain, but the series of reasonable and still unanswered 
      questions continues to give us a clue.
      per the above article: http://www.apfn.org/pdf/SummonsINAG.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/SummonsINAG.pdf>


      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Appearance.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Appearancepdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mphv.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mphv.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/origcomp.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/origcomp.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/grahamaff.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/grahamaff.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mti.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mti.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/brief.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/brief.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/AppearanceUSAG.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/AppearanceUSAG.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/AppearanceINAG01.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/AppearanceINAG01.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/AppearanceINAG02.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/AppearanceINAG02.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mlvsuppl01.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mlvsuppl01pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mtroupd01.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mtroupd01.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Opinion01.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Opinion01.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/ResponseUSAG.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/ResponseUSAG.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/ResponseINAG.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/ResponseINAG.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/briefshwcse.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/briefshwcse.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Opinion02.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Opinion02.pdf> 

      Notation On the Notice of Appeal:
      This is an interesting part of the story. That weekend was a wild one. I
      think I traveled close to 1200 miles, all within Texas. To make a long
      story short, I was enroute from Dallas to Houston to pick up my Sister and
      Niece, so that we could go to a High School Reunion function in Austin,
      and, in the rain, on I-45 South, about the Woodlands, I pulled over, hand wrote
      out the Notice of Appeal, and faxed it to Indiana from a truck stop.
      Rather than rushing into the appeal, it took me until about 3:30 or so,
      to get in touch with one more valuable opinion on this issue. He heard what
      I could tell him in 10 minutes, on two different phone calls of about that
      length, and he found value in the position. That's when I filed the
      appeal, and it was literally about 10 minutes prior to "closing" in Indiana when
      the Notice arrived. Turns out they'd been expecting it pretty much all day.
      VERY helpful clerk and staff on this one. VERY helpful.
      The best way to appreciate this one is probably by our getting a
      certified copy of the one on record with the court. I've got the
      "original" around here, somewhere, but I'm thinking that with the "stamps"
      and all on it, it'll at least look like a Notice of Appeal!
      Harmon
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/MSTAY-1.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/MSTAY-1.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mrehringtro-1.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mrehringtro-1.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mtro-1.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mtro-1.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mrehringtro-1.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/mrehringtro-1.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/AFFIDHLT-1.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/AFFIDHLT-1pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Opinion03.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Opinion03.pdf> 
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Opinion04.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/Opinion04.pdf> 

      Notation: for the following document

      Key to the appellate 
      court opinions is the characterization that the claims made were 
      "without authority," and that the claims have "no merit." While the rest 
      of the court's discussion is interesting, this part of the opinion tells 
      us everything we need to know. The appellate court went beyond 
      addressing the issues raised and addressed the question asked, which is 
      along the lines of, "How in the world can this be happening, legally 
      speaking?" Since the essence of these claims comes straight out of the 
      Constitution, the lesson is that the Constitution is "without 
      authority," and that the Constitution has "no merit," in the "United 
      States" "court" system. Said another way, the Constitution is not 
      "admissible evidence of Law," and, that being the case, the Constitution 
      is not the Supreme Law of the Land. From that point of view, given that 
      the "federal government" arises from private obligations, not the 
      Constitution, it makes sense that the Constitution is completely 
      irrelevant, and that is provides absolutely no limitations on the 
      "federal government," whatsoever. THAT's how the "feds" do what they do, 
      legally speaking.

      Thus, in sum, to solve any problem, it helps greatly to identify it 
      correctly, first. Here, not only do we need to learn to distinguish 
      between the "federal government" and the "constitutional Government," 
      but also we need to learn that there is presently no "constitutional 
      Government" in operation, but only the "federal government."

      The cite to Devvy's web page that contains the indictment language is
      still a good link to that.

      Since the Constitution was not "admissible evidence of Law" for this 
      case, that got me started trying to find when it stopped being the 
      Supreme Law of the Land. Right now, I'm satisfied that it had to have 
      occurred prior to 1850. In the early 1850's, Lysander Spooner witnessed the
      "court's" giving the "jury" the instructions to follow the "law" given by
      the "court." This is a complete abrogation of the Law stated in Brailsford v.
      Georgia, meaning, telling us, giving us "notice," that the "United States
      District Court" in Massachusetts was no longer bound to the Constitution or to
      the prior opinions of the Supreme Court. In other words, the Constitution, and
      the "constitutional Government" it created, got deep-sixed at or before those
      cases came on for trial in the early 1850's.

      Another interesting indicia of the non-existence of the "constitutional
      Government" is the "popular vote" of 1824. Five Presidents, four of them for
      two terms each, were elected per Article II, section 1. That's nine elections
      before the thought ever existed of any "popular vote," a concept found nowhere
      in the Constitution for choosing a President.

      And, even with the 12th Amendment (1804), there were still 20 years before the
      "popular vote" made its entrance. How fitting is it that John Quincy Adams, the
      sixth President, won neither the "popular vote" nor the Electoral Vote? It 
      definitely earmarks that event for our study.

      The legal reality of the non-existence of the "constitutional Government" just
      didn't sink in until I read the 7th Circuit's opinion in this case. Now, it's
      as clear as day. Since it took the padded 2x4 of the 7th Circuit to get
      me "over" that barrier, I don't realistically expect anything short of personal
      experience to persuade anyone else, either. But, then, there's always hope!

      To combine the attached notes with these, here's one perspective, with which
      I'll close this note.

      The State is the sine qua non regarding the "constitutional Government."
      Without States, there is no "constitutional Government." Starting with Article
      I, if there are no States, then there are no Representatives, for
      Representatives represent People in the States.

      And, if there are no States, then there are no Senators, for Senators represent
      the States, directly, in that legislative process. (You're right, of course, to
      look to the so-called 17th Amendment (1913). However, I've already traced the
      non-existence of the "constitutional Government back to 1850, so this particular
      "notice" to us, in 1913, that the States no longer exist, and, therefore, that
      the States have no more need of representation in Congress, is about 60 years
      "late.") The entire purpose of the Senate is to have the States, as such,
      participate in the legislative process. If there are no States, then not only
      is there no Congress, but also there is no need even for a Senate.

      Thus, where there are no States, there is no Congress.

      Continuing with Article II, where there are no States, there is no President.
      From where come the Electors? Right, the States. The Electors hold an Office in
      the "constitutional Government," which exists for the sole purpose of choosing
      the President. If there are no States, then there are no Electors. Where there
      are no Electors, there is no President.

      Thus, where there are no States, there is no President.

      Continuing with Article III, where there are no States, there are no Judges.
      From where come the Judges? Right, the President nominates and appoints, and
      the Senate gives Advice and Consent. Thus, where there is no President, there
      is no nomination or appointment, and where there is no Senate, there is no
      Advice or Consent. 

      Thus, where there are no States, there are no Judges.

      In sum, where there are no States, there is no "constitutional Government," for
      not one Office can be filled.

      Thus, it behooves us to learn the difference between the "federal government"
      and the "constitutional Government," and, even more importantly, the present
      non-existence of the "constitutional Government."

      The "federal government" is the "government" "of the banks, by the banks, for
      the banks." For it to be curbed, we start by ceasing to "trade with the 
      enemy."

      Harmon

      per the article above http://www.apfn.org/pdf/THlitovervw.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/THlitovervw.pdf> 



      Open Letter to President George W. Bush 
      Re: Stay of Execution 
      by Harmon L. Taylor
      http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_execution.htm<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_execution.htm> 



      Download free Windows Media Player 7 CLICK HERE<http://www.windowsmedia.com/download/>

      Oklahoma Cover-Up Part 1 (47 min, 22 sec)
        okc_1.avi<http://www.apfn.org/Movies/okc_1.avi>


      Oklahoma Cover-Up Part II (13 min, 26 sec)
        okc_2.avi<http://www.apfn.org/Movies/okc_2.avi>
        

          

      WHO had access to the Murrah Building?



      Who were the Two Men Jane Graham saw? Click Here for pictures & clip<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/2men.htm>

      Filed last Friday afternoon (05/11/01) by a Dallas lawyer representing Jane Graham and V.Z. Lawton, two bombing victims who were in the destroyed federal 
      building at the time, the lawsuit asks the federal court governing Terre 
      Haute prison to stay McVeigh's execution pending a civil suit the victims 
      have filed - claiming that McVeigh is an indispensable witness in that 
      lawsuit, which is now in the discovery phase.



      "There was a waving motion....like an earthquake...then seconds later an explosion came from BENEATH straight UP through the floor" according to Jane C, Graham, who was on the nineth floor of the Murrah Building at 9 am on April 19, 1995.
      Video Affidavit of Murrah Federal Building Bombing witness/survivor Jane C. Graham:

      Oklahoma Cover-Up Part 3 (47 min, 29 sec)
        okc_3.avi<http://www.apfn.org/Movies/okc_3.avi>
       

      FBI Still Keeping the Lid on Eyewitness Reports 
      http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/government/okc_secrets01-98.html<http://www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/government/okc_secrets01-98.html> 

        See Pictures from film: No Large Crater<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/no_crater.htm> - Debris out, rather than IN<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/debris_out.htm> - Shaking BEFORE Explosion<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/shaking.htm> 

                                     There Was MORE Than One Bomb<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/more.htm> - A Classic Cover Up<http://www.apfn.org/OKC/classic.htm>!

      <http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html>

      Download Acrobat Reader here<http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html>

      Refusal of Jane C Graham's (witness/survivor) Testimony to the Grand Jury
      http://www.apfn.org/pdf/graham.pdf<http://www.apfn.org/pdf/graham.pdf>  

      Although the FBI interviewed Graham, they never showed her any pictures or 
      brought her before a sketch artist. "They only wanted to know if I could 
      identify McVeigh or Nichols," she said. "I said it was neither of these two gentlemen.

      The Oklahoma City Bombing- Were there additional explosive 
      charges and additional bombers?
      http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok.html<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok.html> 

      What Really Happened in the Oklahoma City Bombing? 
      Many Victims' Families Believe FBI Knew Bombing Was Being Planned;
      http://www.comeandtakeit.com/okc1.html<http://www.comeandtakeit.com/okc1.html>   

      JOHN ASHCROFT AND THE OKC BOMBING 
      Devvy Kidd 
      February 8, 2001 
      The new Attorney General, John Ashcroft, has a reputation as being very religious with an abundance of personal integrity. Having said that, now that he is confirmed, I would ask you to join me in burying his office with a demand that he re-open the Oklahoma City bombing. Why? http://www.devvy.com/ashcroft_20010206.html<http://www.devvy.com/ashcroft_20010206.html> 

      <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/TRUCK/truck.html>

      THE RYDER TRUCK IN THE SECRET ARMY COMPOUND. <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/TRUCK/truck.html>


      The Oklahoma City Bombing
      Were there additional explosive 
      charges and additional bombers?
      http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok.html<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok.html>

       
      Waco Scandal Demands New Look at OKC Bombing
      Former Oklahoma state Rep. Charles Key is about to release a stinging 150-page report on the Oklahoma City bombing. Key says evidence surrounding the tragedy doesn't match up with the official government claims. Why, then, is the government lying about what happened? 

      http://www.front14.org/nation/newlook.htm<http://www.front14.org/nation/newlook.htm>   

      The Aryan Republican Army, Elohim City, and the OKC Bombing
      http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ara_okc.htm<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ara_okc.htm>   

      Index for The John Doe Times Volumn 5
      The Truth Shall Set You Free...or in this case hang your coconspirators....
      http://xld.com/public/jdt/jdindx5.htm<http://xld.com/public/jdt/jdindx5.htm>   

      Volume 5, No. 1 - 16 March 1997 
      ** DESPERATE FEDS SCREW UP AND INDICT CAROL HOWE. 
      ** CAROL HOWE, POLITICAL PRISONER? 
      ** FBI SNITCH RICHARD SCHRUM RAISES HIS WEASELY HEAD AGAIN
      -- DOING THE BIDDING OF THE PROSECUTION TEAM? 
      ** "I'M NOT KEEPING MY MOUTH SHUT ANY LONGER ABOUT OKLAHOMA CITY!" 
      ** WHY THE KEHOE BOYS ARE ON THE RUN: THE MUELLER MURDERS
      http://xld.com/public/jdt/jdindx5.htm<http://xld.com/public/jdt/jdindx5.htm>

       
      OK Bomb Articles On Konformist.com
      Subject: Konformist: OK Bomb Articles On Konformist.com
      Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 04:28:48 -0000
      From: "Robert Sterling" robalini at aol.com<mailto:robalini at aol.com> 
      Reply-To: konformist-owner at yahoogroups.com<mailto:konformist-owner at yahoogroups.com> 
      To: konformist at yahoogroups.com<mailto:konformist at yahoogroups.com> 
      Please send as far and wide as possible.
      Thanks,

      Robert Sterling
      Editor, The Konformist
      http://www.konformist.com<http://www.konformist.com/> 
      http://www.konformist.com/2001/okbomb-fbi.htm<http://www.konformist.com/2001/okbomb-fbi.htm> 
      http://www.konformist.com/2001/okbomb.htm<http://www.konformist.com/2001/okbomb.htm> 
      http://www.konformist.com/2001/okbomb-fbi.htm<http://www.konformist.com/2001/okbomb-fbi.htm> 
      Jim Redden 
      pdxs at pop.ptld.qwest.net<mailto:pdxs at pop.ptld.qwest.net> 

      NATION/SPECIAL INVESTIGATION TIME CNN IMPACT 
      WHO IS ROBERT JACQUES? 
      THE FBI WANTS TO TALK TO A MISSING ASSOCIATE OF MCVEIGH'S
      http://www.time.com/time/magazine/1997/dom/970317/nation.who_is_robert.html<http://www.time.com/time/magazine/1997/dom/970317/nation.who_is_roberthtml> 

      PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OF PETITIONER-DEFENDANT, 
      TIMOTHY JAMES McVEIGH AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
      http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/mcveigh/index.html<http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/mcveigh/index.html>  

      John Loeffler
      Charles Key Interview on OKC Bombing
      Tue Jul 3 15:57:21 2001

      Charles Key Interview on OKC Bombing (Archived)

      Steel on Steel Radio Program - Hosted by John Loeffler
      6/02/2001
      Do We REALLY Know What Happened in Oklahoma City? -- Will We Ever?
      Guest: Charles Key / Host: John Loeffler

      This is an excellent interview of former Oklahoma state representative
      Charles Key by John Loeffler on his Steel on Steel program June 2.
      It's archived in either RealAudio or MP3. John asks the important questions.

      LISTEN RealPlayer: http://216.10.100.20/ramgen/sos/so010602.rm<http://216.10.100.20/ramgen/sos/so010602.rm> 
      LISTEN MP3: 
      http://www.steelonsteel.com/mp3/so2001-0602.mp3<http://www.steelonsteel.com/mp3/so2001-0602.mp3> 
      Steel on Steel is a weekly program dedicated to the sharpening of
      ideas, news, commentary, interview, information, and debate, much
      of which you will NOT hear elsewhere. Our goal and pledge is to
      put together 90 minutes of solid news that the mainline media are
      ignoring by ignorance, bias, and/or neglect.
      Hosted by John Loeffler
      HOME: http://www.steelonsteel.com/index.html<http://www.steelonsteel.com/index.html> 

      OKC - now who's the kook?
      03/18/02
      Larry Johnson former CIA agent just said on TV's FOXNEWS Monday at 7:18 CST that the FBI did not pursue any of the leads or ties in the OKC bombing to Muslim terrorists. 
      He admitted all the John Doe 2 sightings were good leads to a middle eastern person... the have now identified (or now admitted) that at least two of the people seen with McViegh were members of the Iraq Republican Guard...and now FBI agent Vogel who was in charge of the OKC investigation has said he feels "guilt ridden" because the if they had chased the leads they might have prevented September 11's attack. Vogel says he was told not to pursue it by higher level officials.

      O.J. SIMPSON: DIVERSION FROM WACO/SUMMER OF 1993
      O.J. Simpson was never indicted!! by Harmon L. Taylor, TX Attorney
      http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OJ.htm<http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OJ.htm> 

      ====================================

      The Calgary Herald
      FBI hid Oklahoma bombing files, court told
      Sat Mar 13 01:41:12 2004

      FBI hid Oklahoma bombing files, court told
      Judge reviews allegations of tainted jurors

      The Associated Press - Thursday, March 11, 2004
      http://www.canada.com/calgary/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=9f6d9082-9f09-4a06-a085-a47137721f41<http://www.canada.com/calgary/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=9f6d9082-9f09-4a06-a085-a47137721f41> site down

      Terry Nichols' attorneys say more than a dozen FBI documents that raise the possibility of additional accomplices in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing weren't turned over by state prosecutors or the federal government for Nichols' murder trial defence.

      The documents, cited in a recent series of Associated Press stories, include two 1990s teletypes from then-FBI director Louis Freeh's office citing possible connections between Timothy McVeigh and a gang of white supremacist bank robbers, the lawyers said.

      Nichols, in federal prison, began trial this month on Oklahoma state murder charges alleging he assisted McVeigh in building the deadly bomb.


      The judge has said he will dismiss the charges with prejudice -- making it very hard for prosecutors to resurrect the case -- if Nichols' lawyers can prove documents that could have aided their defence were withheld.


      Under a Supreme Court ruling, prosecutors and the government are obligated to turn over to defence lawyers all materials that could help clear a defendant, such as evidence that points to other suspects or casts doubt on prosecution witnesses.

      Nichols' attorneys agreed to review the materials cited in the AP story and identify which they could not find among the massive files prosecutors and the government provided them. In all, they identified 13 FBI documents and a handful of other materials.

      "To our knowledge, we have not received these documents from the state or federal government," lead attorney Brian Hermanson said Wednesday.

      In addition, the lawyers said they did not receive any information from prosecutors concerning the FBI's unsuccessful efforts to get permission to interview McVeigh in 2001 to resolve lingering questions before his execution.

      The prosecutor, Oklahoma County District Attorney Wes Lane, said, "Everything the federal government has provided to us has either been given or made available to the Nichols' defence team."

      Nichols, 48, is serving a life prison sentence for the April 19, 1995, bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building that killed 168 people.

      The eighth day of jury selection in Nichols' trial began Wednesday amid revelations that some prospective jurors said they would lie to be selected to possibly convict and sentence the bombing conspirator.

      Judge Steven Taylor said a new line of questioning will be developed to address allegations by one prospective juror that others were willing to lie to get on the jury. "I'm going to deal with this," Taylor said.

      The issue was revealed as the prospective juror said she overheard other possible panelists say they would say anything to get on the jury. The woman was retained on the panel.

      "I'll do whatever it takes to get up there," she paraphrased one of them as saying. "I'm going to say what I can to get on the jury. My decision is already made."
      © The Calgary Herald 2004
      =================================

      Oklahoma City Bombing Questions - packrat at texas.net<mailto:packrat at texas.net> 
      http://www.stopcovertwar.com/McVeigh.html<http://www.stopcovertwar.com/McVeigh.html> 

      Jayna Davis - From Oklahoma City to the Middle East
      http://www.jaynadavis.com/story.html<http://www.jaynadavis.com/story.html> 
      http://www.jaynadavis.com/story-oklahomamag.html<http://www.jaynadavis.com/story-oklahomamag.html> 

      The Oklahoma City Bombing - many unanswered questions
      http://www.akdart.com/okc.html<http://www.akdart.com/okc.html> 


            Subscribe to apfn-1  
               
            Powered by groups.yahoo.com<http://groups.yahoo.com/>  

      American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
      "...a network of networkers..."

      APFN/Ken Vardon
      PMB 107
      6630 West Cactus #B107
      Glendale, Arizona 85304
      e-mail: apfn at apfn.org <mailto:apfn at apfn.org>

      You are visitor 


     


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mcveigh_timothy.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5910 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: murrah.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 21914 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jd2.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3020 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OKC_MOTEL.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 36059 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: okc_co1.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 15686 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: susan-carlson3.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 30122 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bluemarblereport.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 92045 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: arrow_red_rt_clr.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1607 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: JL.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 26064 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: okcpat.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 28204 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0007.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: holeinbldg.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 36514 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bomb_squad.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0009.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: General_Partin.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 32552 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0010.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: what_used.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 38992 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0011.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: handPointer.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1653 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0002.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: getwmpsquareb.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 18486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0003.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: who-access.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 30416 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0012.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: two-men.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 33791 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0013.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: JaneGraham3.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 31131 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0014.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: getacrobat.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0004.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DETAIL.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 20945 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0005.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: flag5.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3557 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0006.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: okc_coverup.htm|Image=1
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 367 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1pixel.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 138 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/shadowgroup-l/attachments/20041019/5975b2ef/attachment-0007.gif>


More information about the ShadowGroup-l mailing list