[Sdalliance] Open Letter to May 1st Coalition
Fred Lonidier
pres2034 at san.rr.com
Mon Mar 6 10:57:46 PST 2017
Rya,
I am on the SDAJ listserve as a member so the emails about May 1 and
the matter of Kasparian came to me that way. It seems related to
planning for May 1. I am a delegate to the Labor Council (from UC/
AFT Local 2034) which endorsed SEIU's plans. I signed up to work on
that event. The matter of allegations is very serious but very hard
to weigh in on without evidence or witnesses which can come to some
adjudicating body, either internal to the UFCW, the CLC and/or the
law. The labor movement has had to be very diligent about due
process as, in relations with employers, we have nothing without it
and supervisors, owners and even other workers can make all kinds of
claims which, without due process, can and has caused enormous damage
to workers and our unions. It is distressing to see the pickets and
read the allegations but, at the same time, hard to take a stand on
without the weight of evidence. And I am aware that all kinds of
acts against vulnerable people never get justice because they occur
out of the sight of others willing to come forward.
Fred
Cw rape
I don't know who you are, and I don't think you came to any mass
meeting so i wonder how you got on this listserv, but I want to point
out that (one of the) allegation(s) about Mickey specifically
involves pressuring his staff into a sexual relationship. A claim of
due process might mean something in a world where UFCW or any local
or national labor body as investigating. But UFCW and the Labor
Council have chosen not to, and there is no criminal case, and as
such there is no possibility of due process from any body that could
pass judgement.
There are multiple claims from multiple female staff members of the
UFCW. What is it that leads you to side eye these women who are
coming forward in a climate that deligitimizes their claims inside
the very union they fought for, not to mention society at large? Why
are you siding with a literal boss in a clear harassment and
discrimination case?
Rya
On Mar 5, 2017 8:38 PM, "Fred Lonidier" <pres2034 at san.rr.com> wrote:
Well, Ryan, I think you want to be very careful here. So far there
are allegations leveled at Kasparian and we see the pickets at the
Delegate meetings. But he is entitled to due process and whether he
"attacked his workers" or not has yet to be established. So far, he
has the full confidence of the CLC Executive Board and the
Delegates. At any rate, the CLC is on board with May 1 as it is
being headed up by SEIU.
My laptop is pretty old so I don't seem to be able to access the
letter to which you refer. Can you send it as an attachment?
Fred
Mickey Kasparian is named in the letter explicitly, right? The man
attacked his workers.
Ryan
_______________________________________________
Sdalliance mailing list
Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/sdalliance/attachments/20170306/873d9ff5/attachment.html>
More information about the Sdalliance
mailing list