[Sdalliance] DAF comments on the agenda for Sunday

[Erin Bodhi]

ditto vanessa

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Vanessa Lopez <vanelops at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Justin et al in DAF,
>
> Would it be possible for folks to make suggestions for how to rearrange
> and revise the agenda directly on the document? I'm personally not sure how
> the below differs from what's already on the agenda, and honestly don't
> have the time or energy to communicate via email to clarify all those
> points.
>
> Thanks,
> V
>
>
>
> On Jan 26, 2017 3:17 PM, "justin hewgill" <jhewgill at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> DAF has a few suggestion regarding this Sunday's meeting. In everyone of
>> these mass meetings our agenda has been too ambitious, in that we have
>> never been able to get through all of it. Also, we approved a delegate
>> council process in the last meeting, so we should be able send most issues
>> to committees or the council of delegates.
>>
>> DAF suggests we only address issues formative to the Alliance at this
>> mass meeting. These items being, (1) a name for the Alliance, (2) the
>> Mission Statement, and (3) the last structural issue of how committees will
>> work with liberals (both individuals and groups).
>>
>> We suggest we also have some time for committee report backs as well, as
>> is currently allowed for in the draft-agenda. However, these should be
>> report-backs and a chance for in-put, and not a full blown discussion to a
>> decision. Mass meetings are just not a good place to make decision.
>> However, specific foundational questions have to be decided this way. So we
>> suggest keeping the agenda to those items.
>>
>> To wrap up, DAF suggests keeping the agenda to the following, not
>> necessarily in this order:
>>
>> (1) Name;
>> (2) Mission Statement;
>> (3) Question re liberal membership in open/campaign committees; and
>> (4) Committee Report Backs
>>
>> in Solidarity,
>> Justin
>>
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information used in this e-mail is
>> confidential, may be legally privileged, and is only intended for the use
>> of the party named above.  If the reader of this is not the intended
>> recipient, you are advised that any dissemination, distribution, or copying
>> of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in
>> error, please immediately notify me by telephone at 909 636-6861
>> <(909)%20636-6861> and destroy this e-mail.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sdalliance mailing list
>> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
>> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sdalliance mailing list
> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/sdalliance/attachments/20170126/7b7cd392/attachment-0001.html>