[Sdalliance] Agenda for our Sunday (2.26.17) Meeting & Self Defense Mtg at noon

Ryan Stray ryanstraysd at gmail.com
Sun Feb 26 10:37:36 PST 2017


My apologies, was borrowing a phone. The last email was from me.

Ryan

On Feb 26, 2017 10:29 AM, "Mickey Smith" <mickey.h.smith at gmail.com> wrote:

> First off, that's a mischaracterization of the proposals being discussed
> at the meeting and of the summary of past business that was given. Second,
> everyone attending the meeting was to avoid discussing details on email
> because of the highly surveiled nature of email in general, as well as
> Google's enthusiastic support for the PRISM program going into a strong
> upsurge in reactionary violence. I strongly recommend people who intend on
> carrying out security work avoid talking so cavalierly about planned or
> unplanned activities, but that aside, ill ask you to refrain from speaking
> on matters you simply weren't present for.
>
> Ryan
>
> On Feb 26, 2017 9:59 AM, "Anne Barron" <anne at prcsd.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear intersectional friends,
>>
>> i see them pretty much inter-related, and that we need to think about
>> strategically matching fundraising, different types of community
>> self-defense (which I see in a much broader scope).
>>
>> I also want to check in with the larger Collective to see what/how we as
>> a group define community self-defense.  there was a lot of discussion at
>> the last Defense Committee about what the Collective meant by self-defense.
>>
>> I remember us talking about several layers of mutual self-defense.
>>
>> Our Teach-in discussion yesterday at the Peace Resource Center reinforces
>> this idea for me- that the system forces us to depend on it.  We need to
>> return to a village reality, where the village is the community
>> self-defense.
>>
>> so I will be there at noon, for anyone who wants to flesh out CRSD
>> community self-defense.  I just am seeing a bigger picture than stand-off
>> with local law enforcements during rallies/marches.
>>
>> best
>> Anne
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Bo Elder <belder76 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll be there at 12noon tomorrow!
>>>
>>> I'm glad the fundraising was a success, and I think we should keep doing
>>> that sort of thing, but I agree with Ryan that that should be the purview
>>> of a fundraising committee.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Ryan Stray <ryanstraysd at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I see a lot of these proposals as being outside the scope of the
>>>> Defense Committee. While it's true that things like housing, bond, food,
>>>> etc are things that the Defense Committee could work on, there is already a
>>>> housing committee (or at least one proposed), a legal committee, and other
>>>> orgs involved in Defense and CR as a whole have overlapping projects along
>>>> these same lines as well. I'm opposed to mission creep in one committee at
>>>> the expense of others.
>>>>
>>>> Ryan
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 25, 2017 8:42 PM, "Anne Barron" <anne at prcsd.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear comrades interested in self-defense & Rapid Response.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's meet at noon tomorrow before the CRSD general meeting to
>>>>> talk/review where we are...I am so in awe of Bo's use of GoFundMe to
>>>>> generate the needed funds to pay off the remaining bails from November 9th
>>>>> (and many thanks to those of you who contributed).
>>>>> So I would also like to add fundraising to our committee work.
>>>>>
>>>>> see ya!
>>>>>
>>>>> Anne
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:50 PM, justin hewgill <jhewgill at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The next meeting committee adjusted the agenda based on folks feed
>>>>>> back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the new agenda: https://docs.google.co
>>>>>> m/document/d/1cBSgbuXjO8YGUM8wHR8JMTUhag7GLewykLHVMqJxhjY/ed
>>>>>> it?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We will NOT be meeting this evening, given that we already got this
>>>>>> together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remember we are meeting at *1pm, this Sunday*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information used in this e-mail is
>>>>>> confidential, may be legally privileged, and is only intended for the use
>>>>>> of the party named above.  If the reader of this is not the intended
>>>>>> recipient, you are advised that any dissemination, distribution, or copying
>>>>>> of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in
>>>>>> error, please immediately notify me by telephone at 909 636-6861
>>>>>> <(909)%20636-6861> and destroy this e-mail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Sdalliance mailing list
>>>>>> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
>>>>>> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sdalliance mailing list
>>>>> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
>>>>> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sdalliance mailing list
>>>> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
>>>> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sdalliance mailing list
>> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
>> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sdalliance mailing list
> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/sdalliance/attachments/20170226/05033b92/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Sdalliance mailing list