[Sdalliance] Request for feedback on Mission Statement

[Bo Elder]

Really appreciate all these thoughts and everyone's hard work.  As far as
the Mission Statement committee's work is concerned, maybe we could
identify phrases that we might tweak depending on how we decide to define
membership/participation?

in solidarity,

Bo

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Whitney r <whitney.lruss at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> *On the question of liberals*
> Monty has been raising a good question but I don't think it has to be as
> simple as wondering whether liberals should be in or out. Here are some
> additional options:
>
>
> *1) Meeting structure/environment*
> One option is to create structures/ways of operating that are unattractive
> to superficial liberal participation. For instance: 5 hour meetings
> governed by consensus, and strict expectations for how people communicate
> with one another, are not for everyone. Robert's Rules, however, are very
> friendly to liberals familiar with moving power through that system
>
>
> *2) Progressive participation*
> Some organizations operate with levels of participation. At the bottom,
> you do not have to agree with any principle to make donations. At the top,
> key organizers/committee chairs etc must be in full agreement with the
> principles, and open to constructive critique when they act against them
>
>
> *3) Frequent orientations*
> If we were interested in either of the above, it would be worth scheduling
> new member orientations where the principles and structure are
> explained/discussed in detail. My general belief is that the kind of person
> folks are concerned about will self-select out of the coalition, but only
> if given enough information to do so
>
> Whitney
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:32 PM, colectivo zapatista <
> colectivozapatistainfo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  I personally agree with proposed change 2 and proposed change 5. Thank
>> you to the ppl putting in work in this committee. -Juan
>>
>> Peace
>>
>> On Feb 4, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Erin Bodhi <erinbodhi15 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> has everyone been reading and giving feedback to this document?
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2017 1:10 PM, "Yesenia Padilla" <yeseniatpadilla at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Angela and Mission Statement Committee for all of your hard
>>> work!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Angela Risi <ang.mar.ris at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Comrades,
>>>>
>>>> Attached is the Mission Statement that was voted on to work with at the
>>>> 1/29/17 meeting. Included in the document are notes from the discussion
>>>> that followed.
>>>>
>>>> Please review this document and send feedback you have for the Mission
>>>> Statement Committee.
>>>>
>>>> In solidarity,
>>>>
>>>> Angela
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sdalliance mailing list
>>>> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
>>>> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Yesenia Padilla*
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sdalliance mailing list
>>> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
>>> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Sdalliance mailing list
>> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
>> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sdalliance mailing list
>> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
>> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sdalliance mailing list
> Sdalliance at lists.resist.ca
> http://lists.resist.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sdalliance
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.resist.ca/pipermail/sdalliance/attachments/20170204/012853d0/attachment-0001.html>