[Onthebarricades] Indigenous events, protests and issues, October 2007
Andy
ldxar1 at tesco.net
Sun Nov 11 19:39:13 PST 2007
* GLOBAL: Indigenous encuentro in Yaqui homeland
* WEST PAPUA: Eight dead in unrest between indigenous groups
* WEST PAPUA: Greenpeace warns against deforestation
* WEST PAPUA: "A blot on mankind's conscience"
* GLOBAL: UN meeting in Sweden addressed by West Papuan and West
Balochistani speakers
* PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Carteret Islands sinking due to global warming
* CANADA: Chiefs to protest lack of progress over treaty rights
* GLOBAL: The Vicam Declaration of the indigenous encuentro
* PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Campaigners blame palm oil scheme for sex trade
increase
* WEST PAPUA: Native Papuans resist deforestation
* WEST PAPUA: Local unrest in Timika, houses burnt after police shoot
former official
* WEST PAPUA: Landslide at Freeport mine kills 13
* OAXACA: Indigenous education as politics
http://www.narconews.com/Issue47/article2834.html
Indigenous Woman from British Columbia: "They've Relegated Us to Authentic
Concentration Camps"
The Indigenous Peoples' Encuentro Began with a Strong United States Presence
By Raúl Romero and Juan Trujillo
Special to The Narco News Bulletin
October 16, 2007
Vicam, Sonora, Mexico, October 11-12, 2007 - The First American Indigenous
Peoples' Encuentro, in the Yaqui tribe's territory, began yesterday
morning-after a traditional ritual celebrated in the ceremonial center of
this community-with the participation of 547 delegates of native peoples and
more than 800 observers, amongst whom were journalists and national and
international civil society members who are adherents to the Sixth
Declaration of the Lacandon Jungle.
The ritual began in the sacred heart, were the Yaqui governors speak in
their language, communicate with each other, and make decisions. In the
ceremony a member of the National Indigenous Congress (CNI in its Spanish
initials) and Subcomandante Marcos, representing the Sixth Commission and
the Zapatista National Liberation Army (EZLN) were also present. While some
listen, others observe the Encuentro (gathering) of the delegations of those
peoples in resistance that in the coming days will speak and listen to each
other.
During the days leading up to the Encuentro, the EZLN delegation's large
presence and participation was expected, composed of Comandantes David and
Zebedeo, Comandanta Miriam, Lupita (daughter of Comandante Hortensia), and
Subcomandante Marcos. However, violent harassment-which ended with the rebel
group being held up for 40 minutes by the Mexican Federal Army on a Sinaloa
highway while the delegation was making its way to Vicam-precipitated the
comandantes' retreat to Chiapas for security reasons. The delegation
explained this in a letter:
Photos: D.R. 2007 Raúl Romero
"We.a delegation named by our peoples were excitedly coming.. The supposed
government is now demonstrating that it has decided to impede at all cost
the organization and the exercise of the Indian peoples' rights in the
exercise of their autonomy in self-organization, and they use all their
political, economic, ideological, and military strength to beat us. On
behalf of the neo-liberal servant, we, the indigenous, are confronting their
authoritarianism, their arrogance, their decadence. But we want to tell you
that they are not going to stop the spreading of the words to the whole
world. In this Encuentro, although we, the comandanta, the comandante, can't
be physically present, our compañero Insurgent Subcomandante Marcos is, and
through his voice, all of the men, women, elders, and all of the EZLN
comandantes and comandantas speak. We will be awaiting the process of the
Encuento and whatever can occur after that. In 515 years, they couldn't
finish us off, even less so now because we will all be united against a
common enemy."
The letter is signed by Comandante Guillermo, Comandantas Susana, Miriam,
Hortensia, Florencia, Insurgente Elena, Lupita, and "third generation
Toñita." It was written after the Sixth Commission decided to not send more
delegates due to the violent harassment they were subjected to by the
Federal Army.
Meanwhile, Subcomandante Marcos greeted all of the representatives of the
native peoples and observers present in this encuentro, which "was reached
despite everything opposing it: distances, language, borders, governments,
lies, persecutions, deaths, and the false divisions they impose on us from
above."
He also said that the native peoples of the American continent, who have
resisted for 515 years, will tell their stories of "pain and dignified
rebellion" in this encuentro, as well as sharing "experience and wisdom" and
naming the demands for justice and liberty that are shared by all of the
indigenous nations who, since the first war of conquest, have been condemned
to oblivion. With this dialogue "the continent will recover its voice,"
continued Marcos, "that today they silence with fire, oblivion, and noise."
The rebel leader ended his participation communicating the Zapatistas'
decision to not participate in this event. Their pains, dreams, and hopes
would be told by the voice of other peoples because the situation of the
indigenous nations in all of America is similar: "the oblivion, the misery,
and the resistance extends over all of the continent."
Then it was Juan Chávez Alonso's turn to speak as representative of the
National Indigenous Congress (CNI), who noted that this encuentro is an
opportunity to raise their voices against "the transnational corporations'
capitalist-colonialist interests and privatizing ambitions," and described
the encuentro as an "assembly of rebellion" of the peoples who are launching
a defense of the "mother earth and against ecocidal, ethnocidal, and
genocidal capitalism" that seeks to eliminate the first inhabitants of the
continent so that then they can take their lands for themselves.
He also said that after 515 years of resistance, in Vicam they will begin to
unite forces to construct a "new project of life" for humanity and nature,
as well as against the "neoliberal-capistalists' programs of death and
destruction."
The Word of the North American Land
Within the framework of working groups about "The history and the word of
our peoples," indigenous nations members' participation, in particular those
from countries that are called "Canada" and "United States," has had special
strength due to the large number of delegates who have attended this
encuentro. That was the case for the Kanion'ke:haka/Mohawk, the Mik'maq, the
Denen nations, the Hawdenaw swee nation, and the Anishanabe. This last group
is an ethnic matrix that is also made up of the Ojibaway tribe. One
component that draw attention was the critique the British Columbian women
made of the organization that forces the nations and peoples onto
reservations, which they call "authentic concentration camps."
A representative of the Mik'maq people spoke through their spokesperson
about their history and reality: "I come from strong people. We came from
the west coast were we have suffered a lot of pain." He explained that they
have resisted colonization, genocide, and globalization. And as a
consequence of those phenomena their culture, land, and natural resources
have been taken away from them: "We have lost our culture and our language;
we have to put a stop to this. We are fighting many battles. The urgency of
the warrior spirit is important among our people in order to recognize
responsibility. We are waking up, we have the opportunity to be part of a
warrior alliance that is growing and that's why we are here."
The Tohono O'odham people from the United States explained that "our
consciousness is being stolen. there are seeds that have been robbed." They
said that the Sea of Cortés (also known as the Gulf of California) was where
their ancestors nourished themselves with fish. But now the government and
the military don't permit them access to the area. Therefore, they proposed
that the indigenous struggle seek "to protect the world, the territory, and
the communities."
The Hopi tribe, also from the United States and part of the Navajo Nation,
dismissed the idea that its resistance began right after its territory was
invaded by the Spanish in the 16th century. They explained that there have
also been many conflicts between "indigenous brothers" that have also
divided the Navajo and elaborated: "These conflicts have been created by the
government and the multinationals. This is important to understand." Also,
they emphasized that their resistance has succeeded in closing some power
plant and mining projects that were planned for the region.
The delegate from the Lakota people of the United States recognized that the
struggle of Mexican indigenous peoples is "very similar to ours, because we
struggle for life." He remembered that this began with the Black Hills War
in 1876 when "we were separated," and from then on not even their religious
centers have been respected. At the end of this messenger's speech he
strongly declared: "Who we are and where we came from won't be forgotten."
Silvia, another representative from this same people, denounced that "the
women have suffered sexual abuses in our communities."
The people of the Achumawi nation, which is located in the state of
California, denounced that 90 percent of their population had been
exterminated by the late-1800s gold rush, because "they contaminated our
waters with mercury and murdered our people, which (in reality) was a
government policy.our women were raped and they stripped us of our land."
They strongly criticized the "energy colonization" that the communities
suffer as a result of hydroelectric dam construction.
They also denounced that there are about "450 sacred ceremonial sites that
are being threatened by construction. And in the University [of California]
Berkeley, there are 14,000 ancestors' remains, which makes up the second
largest collection of bones in the world, and this is also being threatened
by a museum that took one of the ancestors." They equally criticized white
anthropologists.
In the name of the Mohawk people, a nation located in upstate New York,
Montreal, and Toronto, a messenger named Ketenia explained that "Our lands
are close to the Hudson River. We have been struggling against the
corporations that want to steal our land from us. We are one of the biggest
organizations. Our land is rich in minerals and corporations." She explained
that in 2005 the state of New York wanted their lands to build a casino, so
they had to intervene.
"We have begun to recover our lands, and we've brought the government to the
bargaining table, which in reality is a learning table for them, because
they illegally took our lands." According to this representative, they have
succeeded in getting the government to listen to them thanks to direct
action.
The delegate from the Grand River nation, located in Canada, said that
"before they came to our lands we were five nations, but we had conflicts
and we were self-destructing. But one of us was born and came to bring us a
message about how to live and govern ourselves. We've succeeded in
recovering our identity."
"In February 2006 we recovered land were they wanted to construct a housing
development. The police came, but we managed to make an encampment that in
the beginning looked pretty small." She reminded the participants that one
form of struggle is to impose "the law of peace," which isn't just a flag,
but an attitude.
She added that one of the most important struggles is the fight against the
business projects which, according to her, produce unjust arrests, which is
why indigenous culture and identity is lost, because they become "Canadians"
or "United States citizens" in order to not be legally persecuted. "For us
to rise up means to have judicial problems and to go to jail," she said in
closing.
Indigenous Women's Resistance
Within the framework of these accounts, the situation of the Gitxsan Nation
was emphasized. The Gitxsan Nation is a community in Canada which is
occupied by the English and is now known as "British Columbia." The delegate
began by saying that it is a lie that this country is peaceful, because for
her community war is a daily matter, especially for women. She explained
that the first form of domination exercised by the English was to displace
the women from the different roles that they originally had, because "the
women, just like in other cultures, were in charge of maintaining the land
and the culture. They were the protectors, those who cared for the
children." For this reason, she continued, the colonizers saw the women as
the first obstacle and began to implement a series of laws that limited
their rights and participation. This is how in 1876 the "Indian Act" was
decreed in which it was noted that "the indigenous man is the one who
commands and who has the final word," thus ending a matriarchal system and
giving way to a patriarchal one.
These days the situation isn't very different: a policy of discrimination
and war against indigenous peoples is exercised by the governments, and it
is even more aggressive when it comes to women. One example, continued the
delegate, is the "Highway of Tears" where more than two dozen indigenous
women have been recorded missing, all of them under 25 years old.
The Gitxsan woman ended her participation by calling all indigenous women to
unite and demand better justice, and that they imagine new forms of
organization that provide them with better security, because "they can't
hope for anything from the bad governments."
During the morning of October 12, the participation of the North American
delegations ended and in the afternoon the messengers from the Latin
American, Caribbean, and Mexican indigenous peoples were introduced.
Translated by Kristin Bricker. Originally published in Spanish October 14.
http://www.rnzi.com/pages/news.php?op=read&id=35835
Eight dead in tribal violence in Papua
Posted at 02:50 on 18 October, 2007 UTC
Eight people have been killed and 19 others injured in ongoing tribal
violence in Mimika in Indonesia's Papua region.
The Jakarta Post reports that over 120 armed police officers have been
deployed to the Banti area of Mimika's Tembagapura district to try and
control the violence.
The fighting reportedly pits members of the Dani, Damal and Moni tribes
against the Amungme tribe.
Police say the situation remains explosive in the Banti sub-district which
is near the site of the copper and gold mining company Freeport Indonesia.
News Content © Radio New Zealand International
PO Box 123, Wellington, New Zealand
http://www.rnzi.com/pages/news.php?op=read&id=35643
Clearing Papua's forests for palm oil plantations is backwards, warns
Greenpeace
Posted at 03:46 on 09 October, 2007 UTC
Greenpeace has warned that Indonesia's plans to clear Papuan forests for
palm oil plantations will hinder efforts to mitigate climate change.
Indonesia's President has asked Papua's Governor Barnabas Seubu to open up
five million hectares of land for conversion into palm oil plantations in a
bid to increase biofuel production.
Indonesia is on a fresh drive to become the world's biggest bio-fuel
producer, and aims to reduce carbon emissions as well as spending on petrol.
Jakarta also claims it's working to reduce the rampant illegal logging which
is destroying its largest remaining tracts of rainforest, in Papua
But Greenpeace Asia/Pacific's Tiy Chung says the government's plans to cut
more Papuan forest will only increase carbon output.
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/?p=317
Guess which country has experienced only 18 months of independence and is
being brutalised as we speak?
Filed under: Uncategorised, Business/Politics - Chris @ Oct 9th, 2007
By new contributor Tabi-Sal. If you feel like writing for us, drop us an
email!
There is a country which has only experienced 18 months of independence
between colonial rulers. Its waters are poisoned by the by-products of
multinational corporations' extensive mining. Its soils are ruined by
deforestation, and its people are displaced, brutalised, made to disappear.
This nation's vast material wealth is siphoned off by an authoritarian
government, and by western multinationals. These corporations fund
shareholding authorities (imported from Jakarta) which bomb and strafe
villages. As swathes of mountain rainforest are cleared, mined and
militarised, the damage to the environment is passed on to the inhabitants
of these tribal areas, who have no choice but to live off the land. The
collusion of security guard and soldier is the key feature of this new form
of imperialism. The destruction of the land's indigenous population is its
effect.
Melanesians have lived in West Papua for at least 25,000 years. No
compensation has been paid to these peoples by the recent colonisers since
they arrived from Holland approximately 200 years ago, or from Indonesia
around 50 years ago. Presently, mountains sacred to local tribes are
strip-mined at a phenomenal rate. Mining waste is bulldozed into sacred
lakes in quantities of hundreds of thousands of tons. Polluted rivers
flowing deep into the rainforests are grey threads of putrefaction and
death. Displaced peoples die from diseases they have never encountered
before as they are evicted from their mountain homes. Indonesia's GDP growth
increases healthily every year.
It is unsurprising and symbolic that West Papua might be more familiar to us
by its Indonesian name, 'Irian Jaya'. Apart from a brief and doomed
parenthesis of independence in the early sixties, the nation's aboriginal
inhabitants have been seen as obstacles for nearly two hundred years, by two
different governments, in their quest for pillage. For colonialism is not
dead, it has merely evolved. The voiceless man's land is still irreparably
polluted by the bearer of arms. The scarred lands of West Papua are an
indelible blot on mankind's conscience.
http://www.unpo.org/article.php?id=7241
UNPO Press Briefing
2007-10-15
On 12 October 2007 UNPO conducted a briefing for the Swedish press, entitled
Self-Determination as Conflict Prevention, to grant a clearer insight of the
problems faced by many UNPO Members.
The briefing was attended by two UNPO Member Representatives, Mr. Nasser
Boladai from West Balochistan and Mr. Viktor Kaisiëpo from West Papua, who
delivered presentations to members of the Swedish press, and concluded with
an in-depth roundtable discussion.
The event was introduced by UNPO Project Coordinator, Mr. Kevan Berthou, who
outlined the workings of UNPO and the importance of nonviolence as a means
of achieving one's goals.
Following this, Mr. Kaisiëpo delivered a presentation focusing on the
complex situation not only vis-à-vis Indonesia, but also on the internal
heterogeneity of West Papua. Moreover, self-determination and conflict
prevention cannot only be viewed from an inter-human standpoint, but must
also encompass environmental issues, such as the responsible management of
resources and the conflict between society and nature.
Furthermore, he emphasised the value of UNPO being led by its Members, with
their active input allowing the unrepresented to set the agenda, and
confront issues that otherwise may have been sidelined.
Mr. Boladai then continued the briefing with an overview of the situation of
the Balochis in Iran, oppressed for their racial, linguistic and religious
differences. Mr. Boladai outlined the possibility of self-determination
within a federal structure as a means to prevent conflict, but highlighted
the massive challenges in bringing about such change and the difficulty in
remaining nonviolent in the face of extreme provocation.
The issue of nonviolence was picked up by the journalists and carried into
the subsequent discussions. One of the key points raised was how to define
nonviolence, with some journalists asking whether self-defence is still
compatible with the principle of nonviolence.
Delving further into the principle of self-determination, questions were
asked on how to define a concept which ranges from minority rights via
federalism to complete independence, and how self-determination would take
shape in West Papua and West Balochistan. A key issue, it appeared, was the
situation of the minorities within the minority seeking self-determination.
Taking such issues into account is key to developing a style of
self-determination that brings stable and long-lasting peace.
Aside from these points, the discussion covered more detailed aspects of
UNPO, including the application and screening process of Membership, funding
sources, and the democratic procedures regarding the UNPO Presidency and the
UNPO General Assembly, which allows for the effective and transparent
operations of the organisation.
http://www.thenational.com.pg/101707/Nation%2013.htm
Carteret Islands sinking fast
THE Carteret Islands are almost invisible on a map of the South Pacific, but
the horseshoe scattering of atolls in eastern-most Papua New Guinea is on
the frontline of climate change, as rising sea levels and storm surges eat
away at their existence.
For 20 years, the 2,000 islanders living there have fought a losing battle
against the ocean, building sea walls and trying to plant mangroves.
Each year, the waves surge in higher, destroying vegetable gardens, washing
away homes and contaminating fresh water supplies.
Recently, Prime Minister Sir Michael Somare appropriated K4.1 million
(US$1,315,280) to resettle PNG villagers affected by global warming.
The funding was part of a K1.6 billion (US$513,280,000) supplementary budget
handed down by Treasury and Finance Minister Patrick Pruaitch.
Out of the K4.1 million funding, K2 million (US$641,600) will go to the
Bougainville Autonomous Region's Carteret Islanders.
The local Bougainville government has an ongoing resettlement programme
which it hopes to complete by the end of the year.
Rising sea levels will not only displace human populations. Coral reefs are
expected to be affected by changes in ocean levels and sea surface
temperatures.
As a result, the communities that depend upon these marine resources will be
affected as well.
PNG's Carteret islanders are destined to become some of the world's first
climate change refugees.
Their islands are becoming uninhabitable, and may soon disappear below the
waves.
A decision has been made to move the islanders to the larger nearby
Bougainville Island, a four-hour boat ride to the southwest.
Ten families at a time will be moved once funds are released for the
resettlement programme.
An IPCC has predicted that average sea levels are likely to rise between 9cm
and 88cm (3.5-35 inches) by 2100.
http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/story.html?id=5cac8e53-ac35-41fc-822a-77488ace8ca3&k=72695
Chiefs to protest lack of progress on treaty rights
Jeff Rud, Times Colonist
Published: Saturday, October 13, 2007
The B.C. government's much-heralded "new relationship" with First Nations
will be showcased Monday when legislation is introduced to ratify the first
deal reached under the provincial treaty process.
But a group of increasingly vocal chiefs is casting doubt on whether a new
relationship exists. And they plan to protest on the lawn of the legislature
as MLAs begin both the fall session and debate on the Tsawwassen treaty.
These chiefs, who say they represent 140 of the province's 203 First
Nations, claim Premier Gordon Campbell's new relationship with aboriginals
has been simply "words on paper" and has produced little of value to native
people.
They also harshly criticize the B.C. treaty process, saying strict federal
and provincial mandates make it impossible for most First Nations to reach
acceptable deals. Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of
B.C. Indian Chiefs, calls the treaty process "fundamentally flawed and
completely out of line with current case law.''
Phillip said the protesters, representing First Nations both in and outside
the treaty process and including those who believe the Tsawwassen treaty is
infringing on their territories, will "send the distinct message to the
general public that all is not well in B.C.
"The fabric of the 'new relationship' has been greatly strained and is
beginning to tear," he said.
Yesterday, Phillip was among a large group of chiefs who met in Westbank,
near Kelowna, to plan the protest and other action. The group opposes strict
government mandates that they say will mean "extinguishment" of native
rights and title in B.C.
Specifically, they are opposed to both governments' insistence that any B.C.
treaties transfer reserve land out of federal jurisdiction and into
provincial registries and that natives surrender their non-taxable status.
Westbank First Nations Chief Robert Louie said the chiefs are discussing
legal action against both levels of government over the treaty process.
"What we're contemplating here is a potential collective court action across
this province,'' he said. "This could be one of the largest court actions
that this province has ever seen collectively by First Nations.''
Doug Kelly, tribal chief responsible for intergovernmental relations for the
Sto:lo Tribal Council, said Campbell's "new relationship" is now 2 1/2 years
old and there is little to show for it.
"We've not moved beyond the political rhetoric coming from the premier's
office,'' Kelly said. "There's been no change. It's been lip service.''
B.C. Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation Minister Mike de Jong rejected
the characterization of the new relationship as simply "words on paper.'' He
said there is a "long list of agreements and actual advances, reconciliation
agreements. ... All of these things have real commitments, real dollars.''
"If someone is suggesting that a $100-million New Relationship Trust that
was set up and completely arms-length from government, is managed and
decisions are made by a board comprised of aboriginal peoples -- if they are
describing that as signifying nothing, then I disagree with them,'' de Jong
said.
So far, the Tsawwassen treaty is the only one to reach the legislature. The
Maa-Nulth First Nations of Vancouver Island are in the process of ratifying
their treaty, which could come before the legislature in November. But those
two deals are all there is to show for more than 14 years and $1 billion
spent on the B.C. treaty process.
De Jong acknowledged there are a variety of opinions on the Tsawwassen
treaty and other deals in progress. But he said he hoped that people will
understand and respect that the Tsawwassen "have negotiated and ratified
strongly this agreement.''
© Times Colonist (Victoria) 2007
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=20071018144948312
The Vícam Declaration: "we will defend mother earth with our lives"
Thursday, October 18 2007 @ 02:49 PM PDT
Contributed by: Collin Sick
Views: 289
The rebellion that will shake the continent will not repeat the paths and
ways of others that have changed the course of history, subcomandante Marcos
proclaims tonight in the closing ceremony of the Encuentro of the Indigenous
Peoples of América. "When the wind that we are dies down," he adds, "a new
time will open in which we will be all of the colors." After greeting in the
languages of Yoeme, Castilian ["Spanish"], and English, and taking words
from the Yaqui tradition, Marcos declares before the audience, which has
doubled itself on this night in Vícam: "The four wheels of the vehicle of
money are rolling again over the path of the blood and the pain of the
peoples of the continent," in what he calls "the largest war in the history
of humanity, which is already 515 years old." The war that they commemorate
every October 12.
by Hermann Bellinghausen
Originally published in La Jornada
Translation by Zapagringo
Vícam, Sonora, October 14. The rebellion that will shake the continent will
not repeat the paths and ways of others that have changed the course of
history, subcomandante Marcos proclaims tonight in the closing ceremony of
the Encuentro of the Indigenous Peoples of América. "When the wind that we
are dies down," he adds, "a new time will open in which we will be all of
the colors."
After greeting in the languages of Yoeme, Castilian ["Spanish"], and
English, and taking words from the Yaqui tradition, Marcos declares before
the audience, which has doubled itself on this night in Vícam: "The four
wheels of the vehicle of money are rolling again over the path of the blood
and the pain of the peoples of the continent," in what he calls "the largest
war in the history of humanity, which is already 515 years old." The war
that they commemorate every October 12.
This war now reproduces "the age and methods of the great trusts and
estates, of the epoch in which the crowns of Europe dominated through blood
and fire." Referring to the repression that armies and paramilitary forces
use, "just as in the times of the Conquest," in order to eliminate entire
populations.
"Nevertheless, something has changed: there has never been so much
destruction and stupidity by the governments, such brutality against the
earth and people." Because, indicates the Zapatista delegate, "it happens
that they are killing the world." They say that it is "electoral democracy"
that thing with which the "bossy people" make the "business" of bringing the
world to catastrophe. There above "there is no hope for the Indian peoples."
In this encuentro, "memory has been the invisible thread that unites our
peoples," explains Marcos, and concentrates the cause of their struggles
into just one word, which comes from the birth of humanity: "freedom". It is
what the people want, he continues, "and it cannot exist without justice or
democracy." It trusts that there will be "a world without rulers," something
that "seems impossible" today.
They denounce the growing plunder of the land
In turn, the Rarámuri Francisco Palmo reads the final declaration of the
Encuentro of the Indigenous Peoples of América. It is directed against the
arrogance of power, because the plundering of the land and resources of the
people "grows with each passing day." But, it adds, "the resistance and
indignation of the people grows as well."
The 570 delegates from 67 indigenous peoples, coming from 12 american
nations, affirmed, in the Declaration of Vicam: "We are descendents of the
peoples, nations and tribes that first gave name to these lands; that were
born of mother earth and maintain a sacred respect towards her that provides
us with life and keeps us in death; thus we declare to the entire world that
we will care for and defend mother earth with our lives." They tell of the
"pain suffered from the attack of the invaders, supported in the false
arguments of cultural exclusivity and arrogant civilizing presumptions, with
the purpose of plundering our territories, destroying our cultures and
disappearing our peoples."
The participants in the encuentro proclaimed their historic right to free
self-determination, "respecting the different ways that, for the exercise of
this, our people decide, according to their origin, history and
aspirations." Also, they reject "the war of conquest and capitalist
extermination imposed by the transnational companies and the international
financial organizations in complicity with the great powers and nation
states."
They express their rejection of "the destruction and sacking of mother earth
by means of the occupation of our territories for industrial, mining,
agribusiness, touristic, savage urbanization and infrastructure activities,
as well as the privatization of the water, land, forests, oceans and coasts,
biological diversity, the air, the rain, traditional knowledge and all that
is born of mother earth."
They oppose "the registration of the land, coasts, waters, seeds, plants,
animals and traditional knowledges of our peoples with the aim of
privatizing them," and they reject the occupation and destruction of sacred
centers and places, as well as the mercantilization of their culture. They
also reject the Escalera Náutica or Sea of Cortés megaproject and the
construction of the coastal highway inside of Yaqui territory.
The encuentro ratifies its rejection of the 2010 Winter Olympics "in
Vancouver, Canada on sacred territory, stolen from the Turtle nation with
the goal of installing ski runs."
They denounce that the war of conquest and capitalist extermination "worsens
like never before the exploitation of the members of our peoples on
plantations and in sweatshops, or as migrants in cities and distant
countries, where they are hired in the worst conditions, finding themselves
in situations of slavery and forced labor."
The rejections extend to the big transnational stores, "that plunder the
economic resources of the communities," and to neoliberal policies, which
debilitate communitarian economies and food sovereignty and result in the
loss of native seeds. They commit to seek the integral reconstitution of
their peoples and to strengthen their cultures, languages, traditions,
organization and self-government.
"Supported in our culture and vision of the world, we will reinforce and
recreate our own educative institutions, rejecting the educative models that
the nation states impose on us to exterminate our cultures."
They pronounce against "all form of repression towards our peoples,
expressed in the militarization and paramilitarization of our territories,
forced displacement, mass deportation, the imposition of borders in order to
divide and fragment, and the imprisonment and disappearance of those who
struggle for the historic revindication of our peoples".
The absent indigenous "political prisoners" are a strong "presence". Some
sent greetings from El Amate (Chiapas) and Molino de Flores (Texcoco, in
particular the Mazahua Magdalena García Durán). "They were" the Oaxacans of
Loxicha, San Isidro Aloapam, the organization VOCAL and other members of the
Popular Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca; also the Zapatista prisoners in
Tabasco, as well as the Lakota leader Leonard Peltier. They demanded
immediate freedom for all.
The Yaqui of Vicam and from other towns came in great numbers to the
closing, in which the traditional dances of the Deer and the Pascola were
offered. Thus, nearly 3 thousand people participated in the culminating
moment of the encuentro.
http://zapagringo.blogspot.com/2007/10/vcam-declaration.html
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7009001766
Sex Trade Rise In Papua Palm Oil Plantations, Says World Rainforest Movement
October 30, 2007 11:15 p.m. EST
Paul Icamina - AHN News Writer
Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea (AHN) - A scheme to include more women into
palm oil harvesting has turned into a sex trade, according to the World
Rainforest Movement (WRM).
The "mama card" and the "mama lus frut" scheme has been hailed as an
outstanding success for increasing loose fruit collection, bringing women
into oil palm production and increasing their income.
Until the introduction of the mama lus frut scheme, payment for oil palm
harvest often ended up with the men even though women and children were all
involved. Under the scheme, women exclusively collect the loose fruits and
have their own payment card called the "mama card."
Then some women desperate for cash decided to provide sex to men in exchange
for more loose fruit to be left by the men for them to collect, said the
Uruguay-based group.
Field trips in Oro and West New Britain Province between 2003 and 2007
showed there are now more women working in the oil palm groves "offering an
opportunity for a sex trade to take place," it said.
"This situation has dissuaded genuine women pickers, who fear being
tarnished with the same brush, from taking part in the scheme," the WRM
said. "Some village women interviewed said they would not pick fruit unless
they had a male escort.
Papua now has five major plantations. A land-intensive industry, any
expansion means Papuan forests are cleared, says the Australian Conservation
Foundation. The habitat for plants and animals also shrinks.
http://www.freewestpapua.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=406&Itemid=2
Native Papuans fight against deforestation
The Jakarta Post, October 26, 2007
Neles Tebay, Abepura, Papua
The central government, investors in palm oil plantations and timber
companies need to know that deforestation is and will be rejected by
indigenous Papuans from 252 different tribes living in the western half of
the island of New Guinea.
If the Papuans were consulted, they would say: "Don't cut down our trees."
Under Soeharto's regime, Papuans protesting against the destruction of their
ancestral forests by government-authorized companies were simply accused of
being separatists or against national development. Protesters were always
silenced violently by the military and police, who seemed to love protecting
timber companies.
However, the 2001 law on special autonomy for Papua province gives more
freedom for Papuans to raise their voices. Papuans, then, have begun to
protest against deforestation within their ancestral forests.
The latest example of the rejection of deforestation was demonstrated in
September 2007 by indigenous Papuans of the Wate tribe in Nabire regency
(Cenderawasih Pos, Sept. 20, 2007).
It was reported members of the Wate tribe strongly opposed a plan by PT
Harvest Raya, in collaboration with PT Jati Dharma Indah, to clear thousands
of hectares of their ancestral forest to make way for palm oil plantations.
The protesters have demanded the local government of Nabire regency revoke
the permission already given to the companies.
The Papuans' rejection of deforestation raises some questions. Why do
indigenous Papuans courageously reject deforestation? Is the rejection a
reflection of what the central government calls "Papuan separatism"? Is it a
manifestation of being anti-government or anti-development, the accusations
made by the central government in Jakarta for more than four decades? Is it
sign of not wanting to better their future?
The reasons behind the rejection are related to their culture. Their
rejection is rooted in and guided by the life-giving values of local
culture.
Papuans never see their virgin forests simply as a sea of trees that can be
cut down in order to make millions of dollars.
The forest, for indigenous Papuans from all tribes, has multi-dimensional
meanings.
Indeed, Papuans never consider the forest as an enemy that has to be
eradicated from the surface of the earth. Rather, it is first and foremost a
member of the community.
Papuan community is composed not only of living people, but also the dead,
the spirits and nature.
That's why each community, both as a tribe and a community within a tribe,
always has its own forest within a clearly defined territory.
So, culturally speaking, a Papuan can never be separated from the forest.
It would also be a mistake if Papuan forest was seen as a isolated thing
from the Papuans themselves, because the forest and the people form one
community.
For Papuans, a forest can mean a living pharmacy that provides all the
necessary natural medicines. In times of need, Papuans go to the forest to
collect natural medicine.
The forest is also considered a food store or a living supermarket, for it
provides vegetables, fruits, fish and animals.
People used to get the necessary materials for houses, traditional boats,
firewood and fences in their own forest.
It is a Papuan's belief that their ancestors and deceased members of the
community reside in the forest. They are the guardians of the forest,
including plants and animals, owned by the community.
The forest, for Papuans, is a living temple, chapel or mosque, where people
come and pray. It is the place where all rituals are conducted by a
community or individually. Papuans go into their ancestral forest if they
want to communicate with the ancestors or the dead.
The deeper sense of forest is expressed in the Papuan saying "Hutan adalah
mama" (the forest is our mother).
The forest is respected as a mother who tirelessly cares for, protects and
sustains all of the members of the community, including the animals.
Papuans cannot imagine life without the forest. Emphasizing the deeper
meaning of forest, they say "Hutan kita, hidup kita" (our forest, our
lives).
It is for the sake of life that every Papuan is educated from childhood the
importance of maintaining a correct relationship with the forest.
We can now understand that deforestation, for Papuans, means destroying a
living pharmacy, damaging the living supermarket, destroying the place of
worship, expelling the ancestors and the dead and committing adultery
against the mother forest.
Deforestation, then, will bring about suffering, disaster and chaos for
Papuans. That's why indigenous Papuans reject deforestation.
Papuans learned the importance of the forest for life neither from the Dutch
nor the Indonesian government, but from Papuan cultural tradition.
The cultural concept of forest is handed down from one generation to the
next.
The central government should respect Papuan culture, including the cultural
understanding of forest, and utilize it to protect the Papua's forests.
By doing so, the government and Papuans could jointly prevent Papua's
forests from being lost to deforestation.
Otherwise there will be war between Papuans preserving Papua's forests and
the central government proposing deforestation.
The writer is a lecturer at the Fajar Timur School of Philosophy and
Theology, in Abepura, Papua.
http://news.monstersandcritics.com/asiapacific/news/article_1370991.php/Tribesmen_torch_homes_in_Indonesias_Papua
Asia-Pacific News
Tribesmen torch homes in Indonesia's Papua
Nov 4, 2007, 1:02 GMT
Jakarta - Riot police and soldiers fired warning shots Sunday after
tribesmen in Indonesia's Papua province set several homes on fire in unrest
triggered by the death of a former local police chief, local media reports
said.
At least 10 homes belonging to locals in Papua's Timika district were
torched, forcing occupants aided by security officers to carry out their
possessions and flee, the state-run Antara news agency reported.
Rioter also set a car ablaze.
Timika is located in Indonesia's easternmost province of Papua, about 3,150
kilometres north-east of Jakarta.
In an attempt to stop the violence, riot police and troops firing warning
shots to disperse the mob. The combined security forces were stationed at
strategic locations and combed vital areas in order to prevent the rioting
from escalating further.
Two armoured vehicles were stationed in Timika's nearby business district,
the state-run media reported, while dozens of residents sought refugee at
local police stations.
A reporter with the Jakarta-based Elshinta private radio reported that one
person had suffered a gunshot wound Sunday, while several people were
arrested.
Brigadier General Andilolo, deputy police chief in Papua, told the radio
station that peaceful means were being attempted to defuse the tension,
including negotiations with the tribes and other community leaders in an
attempt to restore calm.
Triggered by the death of a respected elder from a local tribe, identified
as Yance Ikomou, hundreds of angered tribesmen blocked the main road
Saturday afternoon in Timika. Tribesmen also gathered in a field demanding
an explanation of their leader's death.
Ikomou died early Saturday at a local police station after he was arguing
with a fellow police officer, following the reported arrest of his son for
disturbing the peace while drinking.
Papua Police Chief Max Donald was quoted as saying that Ikomou suddenly
collapsed and was rushed to a nearby hospital, where he later died.
Hours earlier, anger over Ikomou's death prompted tribesmen to attack the
police station where he had been. Police reportedly shot back, killing at
least one rioting tribesman.
© 2007 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:dCP4kU4MZ-YJ:www.thejakartapost.com/detailgeneral.asp%3Ffileid%3D20071104173934%26irec%3D4+Peace+deal+reached+after+riot+in+Timika&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=uk
Angry mobs burn houses in Timika
JAKARTA (Antara): Angry mobs on Sunday morning set fire to houses in Timika,
Mimika regency, Papua following the death of a local policeman.
Antara reported that at least 10 houses in Timika Indah residence were set
on fire.
However, later in the day local police, Army and Air Force personnel said
they had the situation under control.
There have been no reports of arrests.
The incident began when a local policeman, identified as Adj. Comr. Yance,
went to the Mimika Baru Police office to complain after his son was beaten
by policemen for drinking liquor and misbehaving.
Unsatisfied with the response of his colleagues, Yance was later involved in
a fight with another police before they were separated, Antara reported.
However, after the fight, Yance suddenly collapsed. He was rushed to Mitra
Masyarakat Hospital, in Mimika where he was pronounced dead. The cause of
his death remains unknown.
Yance's death provoked angry mobs in Mimika to attack a local police office
on Saturday.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-30308020071103
Landslide at Freeport Indonesia's mine injures 13
Sat Nov 3, 2007 12:52pm IST
Email | Print | Digg | Single Page
[-] Text [+]
JAKARTA (Reuters) - A landslide injured 13 workers at U.S. firm Freeport's
gold and copper mine in Indonesia's Papua province on Saturday, the company
said.
The landslide outside the Grasberg mine did not affect company operations,
Mindo Pangaribuan, a Freeport Indonesia spokesman, said.
"It's a natural incident. The victims sustained light injuries," he said,
adding that the injured, all Indonesian workers of the mine, had been taken
to the company-run hospital.
The mine -- believed to have the world's third-largest copper reserves and
one of the biggest gold deposits -- has been a frequent source of
controversy over its environmental impact and the share of revenue going to
Papuans.
http://www.narconews.com/Issue47/article2860.html
Indigenous Education as Politics
The Second National Congress on Indigenous and Intercultural Education
By Nancy Davies
Commentary from Oaxaca
October 28, 2007
A reggae song by Peter Tosh called "Equal Rights" has a lyric which goes,
"everyone is crying out for peace; none is crying out for justice." Tosh
sings "I don't want no peace, I need equal rights and justice."
Photos: D.R. 2007 Nancy Davies
The Second National Congress on Indigenous and Intercultural Education in
Oaxaca this week blossomed with peoples from all over Mexico, in a colorful
array of men clad in the short pants of Chiapas authorities moving among
women in jeans or long skirts or crowned with beribboned braids. It's been a
long process of self-definition for cultural rescue, language preservation,
and equal rights and justice, led by the Coalition of Indigenous Teachers
and Promoters of Oaxaca (CMPIO, by its Spanish initials.) Listening to each
other and sharing experiences play a major role.
Oaxaca is a state with 16 different language groups; many of which were on
the verge of disappearing when CMPIO stepped forward to promote bilingual
education. Last July 30, I visited a workshop for teachers which focused on
how grandmothers can renew their vanishing languages with their
grandchildren: the in-between generation of parents were mono-lingualized by
the state education system. Fernando Soberanes, present at that CMPIO event,
said that the range of languages and experiences in all of Mexico is
mind-boggling. There are at least 62 languages, with about 150 important
variants. Oaxaca's Zapoteco, for example, is spoken in seven variations, not
mutually intelligible. At least a dozen Mexican languages verge on
extinction, which implies a cultural loss as well. (For more information on
languages in Mexico, INEGI, the national bureau of statistics, is a standard
source). Hence the current congress has worked to present equal opportunity
for geographical regions, and for gender equity as well because so many
women historically were left out of both schooling and consultation.
Education in general in Oaxaca has been deplorable. Many accept government
propaganda against teachers, but most of them, and especially the indigenous
bilingual teachers, are heroic in combating state neglect. The indigenous
teachers' goal, through participation of all, is to invent methods and
materials where printed resources in their mother tongues scarcely exist. A
method from the spring workshop, offered by an American professor Lois
Meyers, focused on going out into the street to gather printed words, on
shops or tires or building walls. The printed word becomes precious.
Systemization of bilingualism is still far off, aided by sharing of various
educational practices. The many alphabets have been codified, along with
adaptations as needed of sounds that do not appear in Spanish.
A related consideration of education springs from the extremely high rate of
childhood malnutrition - about 50 percent of rural children suffer a dietary
deficiency - and the lack of health services. Remote towns receive scant
resources.
Nevertheless, under CMPIO's promotion, Oaxaca is making strides with
bilingual primary education, pilot projects at the secondary level, the
creation of 20 intercultural community senior high schools, the normal
school for indigenous education in the town of Tlacochahuaya, and the
Intercultural University Ayuuk in the Mixe region. This places Oaxaca among
the leaders for indigenous education, in a state where a third to one half
of the population - especially women - remains illiterate.
Services for an Alternative Education (EDUCA, in its Spanish initials), also
one of the first organizations to sign on to the APPO in June of 2006,
assisted in organizing the Second Congress and served as one of the
participants.
In a press conference, EDUCA member Aljandro Sandoval explained that the
First National Congress for Indigenous and Intercultural Education (CNEII),
held in Pátzcuaro, Michoacán in 2002, made clear the necessity of
strengthening regional and local participation to draw on the richness of
options and ideas already in practice.
This year's congress gathered about 400 delegates from 30 different
indigenous Oaxacan peoples, participants from 16 other states, and from
Chile, Ecuador, Guatemala, and the U.S.
The U.S. participants included, by video presentation, linguist/political
analyst Noam Chomsky, who saluted the "valiant teachers of Oaxaca" for their
professional work in education, but above all for participating in "a
struggle of far-reaching importance." The struggle of Oaxacan teachers, he
said, "has an impact at this time in all of Latin America." Chomsky sees
Latin America as the most exciting area of the world, for the first time in
modern history, because of the movement toward an important level of
integration instead of "being separated among themselves and dominated by
the imperial powers.. Latin America is beginning to overcome the true curse"
of the American continent, "the curse of an enormous gulf, without
precedence in the world, between a small elite with enormous wealth and a
vast mass of people profoundly impoverished."
Both Chomsky and the Mexican writer Carlos Montemayor observed that
indigenous education necessitates a political posture. Chomsky in his video
remarked that "organizing is of paramount importance, because it throws
overboard 500 years of miserable ugly history, by revitalizing languages,
cultures and technical knowledge."
Montemayor, addressing the congress in person, added, "we are all profoundly
racist in Mexico" because Mexicans, as a mixture of Spanish and original
peoples, in public education date their history from the arrival of Spain,
throwing aside the prior three thousand years of civilization. (Montemayor
did not mention the admixture of Africans brought to Mexico by the Spaniards
as slaves, nor the prior agricultural discoveries of perhaps 8,000 BCE.)
Mexico must recover its indigenous self, he added.
In Mexico, many laws stand on the books regarding the rights of the
indigenous peoples, including not only the federal Constitution and the
Oaxaca state constitution, but the San Andrés Peace Accord reached in 1996
after the Zapatista uprising and never implemented. The indigenous peoples
now struggle across the state of Oaxaca regarding land and water, mining,
and wind power, as well as for equal education and health services. During
the height of the popular movement initiated in June, 2006 the goal of peace
was invoked on all sides by the government, the church, by the tourist and
commercial sectors in Oaxaca.
In the country at large there exists no true policy of what is now called
intercultural education, which would place indigenous and mestizo needs on
an equal footing. As Fernando Soberanes said, "There is ongoing social and
institutional discrimination, and indigenous languages continue to
disappear."
Ixcateco, Chocholteco, Zoque and Chontal languages stand in gave risk of
being lost, which in the future would mean "a real poverty for humanity and
for culture."
Therefore, he said, one of the objectives of the second National Congress of
Indigenous and Intercultural Education is to initiate a strong resistance
movement against this kind of government policy.
Soberanes accused that the politics of education toward the Indian peoples
are absolutely discriminatory. The expenditure per student in basic
education is 8,000 pesos annually, while for an indigenous child is about
200 pesos.
Furthermore, he added, the State gives "the least and the worst education"
to the Indian peoples because they are the ones who attend schools in
horrible conditions, if they have any school at all, because the in the
majority of cases classes are given under a tree or on top of a rock.
And if that weren't enough, the teachers "are the worst trained"; so much so
that children as docents have no teaching material. At the same time, the
curricula proposed by the government do not take into account the indigenous
ways, customs and culture.
That fact, he highlighted, "is leading to the loss of identity of the
peoples" and when identity disappears there will be no policy on teaching
the language. Instead, the strategy of grand capital has caused an expulsion
and there are entire populations moving north in the country in search of
options.
In spite of the work of social organizations trying to save the indigenous
culture, these efforts cannot halt this type of problem, because they have
to do with structural issues of the current political and economic policies.
Proposing new agendas for federal, state and city governments goes forward,
but at the same time a strong popular movement for alternative education
also goes forward.
The challenge falls on the indigenous population to organize and produce
their own educational agendas. The indigenous teachers recognize that
languages change, and words enter and leave every language. They don't
oppose the evolution of languages or cultures. But they demand equal rights,
and justice.
More information about the Onthebarricades
mailing list