[news] Solid Proof The U.S. Government Is Lying

[Gordon Flett]

http://truthout.org/docs_02/021303A.htm

Osama Rallies Muslims, Condemns Hussein 
By William Rivers Pitt 
t r u t h o u t | Perspective 

Wednesday 12 February 2003 

Osama bin Laden rose from the dead yet again on Tuesday to prophesy
doom and death for America. This is nothing new; he has been clawing his
way out of various burial holes for seventeen months now, and always
manages to strike fear into the American heart by way of the American
media and the Bush administration at exactly the moment when incredibly
important shifts in history are in the offing. 

At this moment, George W. Bush stands almost completely alone in his
desire to make pre-emptive war on the nation of Iraq. Several key NATO
allies - France, Germany and Belgium among them - have thrown sand into
the gears of battle by refusing to prepare Turkey for an immediate war
they do not support nor deem necessary. As this incredible state of
affairs unfolded, Americans found their ears ringing with orange-hued
warnings of imminent death. Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge went so
far as to tell people to load up on plastic sheeting and duct tape so as
to bar their windows from chemical attack, but the administration he
calls home made sure to tell people to live their lives normally and
continue shopping. 

And so it goes. This is fairly standard stuff within the American echo
chamber. Let there be one important piece of legislation, or one highly
embarrassing turn of events for the administration, and the word goes
forth that the sky is falling. We have been dealing with this
politically manufactured low-grade hysteria for many months now. Most
Americans have reached a suspended state of disbelief about it all, and
won't be taking these warnings seriously unless they see Osama bin Laden
on their doorstep in a black cassock with scythe in hand. Bush and
Ashcroft will soon run out of colors on the warning chart if this keeps
up; the shade after red likely exists somewhere in the fourth dimension,
visible only to ultraconservative war-hawks and media talking heads. 

When the voice of Osama comes out of the television, however, things
suddenly become much more serious. The Bush administration may have
forgotten him entirely, but every single American still sleeps with
visions of burning towers and plummeting bodies projected on the backs
of their eyelids. Peter Bergen, noted terrorism expert, stated on CNN
that such messages from bin Laden usually herald new attacks. If the
Orange Alert was dubious on Monday, it was given new importance on
Tuesday. 

Secretary of State Colin Powell set the stage for this new bin Laden
statement early on Tuesday, much to the surprise of CIA Director George
Tenet. Powell, during testimony at a Senate Budget Committee meeting,
let it drop that the Middle East news network Al Jazeera had in hand a
tape of Osama bin Laden. Tenet, seated with the Intelligence Committee,
had not heard of this tape. One is left wondering at Powell's sources,
especially after the story unfolded. 

Powell used the existence of this tape, and the words he claimed bin
Laden had said on it, to further tie Saddam Hussein to international
terrorism. He claimed bin Laden was clearly establishing a connection
between himself and Hussein on the tape, beyond all question. "This
nexus between terrorists and states that are developing weapons of mass
destruction," said Powell, "can no longer be looked away from and
ignored." 

The actual tape, played and translated live on every major cable news
channel, told a very different story. Osama bin Laden swore vengeance
against America if Iraq was attacked, and demanded that the Muslim world
stand in solidarity with the Muslim people of Iraq. In very clear words,
Osama bin Laden told the people of Iraq to rise up against both American
aggression and against "socialist" Saddam Hussein. If the translations
that were provided were reliable, there is no ambiguity in bin Laden's
words on the matter. So much, it seems, for Powell's case that Hussein
and bin Laden are working together. 

And this is where it gets interesting. 

An MSNBC.com report on the bin Laden tape carried the following
sentence: "At the same time, the message also called on Iraqis to rise
up and oust Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, who is a secular leader."
This clearly confirms the clarity of mind Osama bin Laden displayed in
regard to Saddam Hussein, and conforms to the recorded message heard by
millions and millions of people around the world. 

Less than twenty minutes after this report appeared on MSNBC, that
sentence was deleted from the report. A few intrepid Internet news
junkies, including myself, preserved what is called a 'screen-grab' of
the original article before it was scrubbed. The version of the article
currently in existence has replaced the text above with this far more
benign text: "The taped statement reflected Saddam, a secular leader,
but made it clear that Saddam was not the immediate target." A similar
story line, bereft of the portions describing bin Laden's wish that
Hussein be killed, has appeared in virtually every mainstream news media
report on the matter. 

The manner in which this story unfolded brings forth a number of serious
questions. 

First of all, questions must be asked regarding Colin Powell's motives
in this. The recording heard by the world diverged significantly from
the spin Powell put on it before the Budget Committee. Osama bin Laden
did not state an alliance with Saddam Hussein, but with the Muslim
civilians in Iraq who will bear the bloody brunt of any American attack.
In fact, bin Laden told the Iraqi people to rise up against Hussein.
This is not the way allies deal with each other. 

Why would Powell go to such lengths to stretch the glaringly obvious
truth in this matter? He is already suffering from a deficit of
credibility in the aftermath of the plagiarism scandal that is currently
rocking Tony Blair's administration. Powell stood before the UN last
week and praised a British intelligence dossier that contained
cut-and-pasted pages and pages of an essay, with all spelling and
grammatical errors intact, written by a postgraduate student from
California. The data was years out of date, flat-out contradictory in
several key areas, used without the student's awareness, and yet was
offered as an up-to-the-minute assessment of Iraqi weapons capabilities. 

This, in combination with Powell's obviously skewed interpretation of
Tuesday's bin Laden recording, forces us to call into question every
single word he and the Bush administration have said on the matter. The
question of whether Saddam Hussein has ties to al Qaeda terrorism and
Osama bin Laden can be put to bed now, it seems, alongside the tatters
and shreds of honor and dignity formerly enjoyed by the Secretary of
State. 

More ominously, why would a news network like MSNBC so obviously haul
water for the failed allegations of the Bush administration? Events
happen in seconds on the internet, but merely scrubbing uncomfortable
sentences from articles cannot stop the tens of thousands of readers who
are wise enough now to save the evidence before it evaporates in a cloud
of silicon. 

These deletions display a manifest breach of faith on behalf of MSNBC,
and call to mind issues surrounding the conflict of interest that are
inherent in the ownership of this network. MSNBC, along with NBC and
CNBC, are owned by the corporate giant General Electric. GE is one of
the largest defense contractors on the face of the earth, and will,
bluntly, be paid a king's ransom in the event of a war. Following this
line of questioning leads to some dark corners, indeed. How often is the
data being manipulated by the corporate-owned media? Are we to rely
solely on the nimble fingers of keyboarded citizens to get to the heart
of the matter? 

A report appearing later on Tuesday on MSNBC.com served to refute the
claims of collusion between bin Laden and Hussein. "Although Powell
sought to characterize the tape as a concrete link between al-Qaida and
the Iraqi government," the MSNBC.com report read, "White House officials
acknowledged later to NBC News that it did not. Powell did not know it
had not been broadcast when he spoke to the committee and was 'a little
on the front of his skis,' a government source said." These lines were
buried deep within the report. 

By Wednesday morning, this text had been completely removed from the
article. 

Virtually the entire global community stands against us today on the
subject of this war, with nations willing and able to destroy NATO
before allowing it to take place. The Bush administration has cut
billions of dollars from street-level homeland defenders like police
forces and fire houses, yet has the eagle screaming for a war that will
be fought simultaneously in downtown Baghdad and in your utterly
undefended neighborhood. They have the gall, simultaneously, to speak of
trillion dollar tax cuts for rich people that will further debilitate
our budgetary ability to defend ourselves. Links between Osama bin Laden
and Saddam Hussein have proven to be not only false, but laughable. The
credibility of the Bush administration has been destroyed. 

And yet we go, with the news media whistling 'Onward Christian Soldiers'
all the while. The Bush administration is ecstatic, believing they can
spin bin Laden's statement of support for Iraqi civilians into a
connection between the terrorist and Hussein. 

You are being lied to, clumsily. 

Pass it on. 

                  ------- 
William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times bestselling author of two books
- "War On Iraq" (with Scott Ritter) available now from Context Books,
and "The Greatest Sedition is Silence," available in May 2003 from Pluto
Press. He teaches high school in Boston, MA. 

Scott Lowery contributed research to this report.