No subject
Tue Jun 21 03:45:27 PDT 2011
Himalayas threatens to engulf southern Asia
CRESCENT OF CONFLICT: Flashpoints of a region in turmoil
Observer Worldview
Luke Harding
Sunday May 12, 2002
The Observer
It was, by any standards, an unpleasant form of death for the few terrified
survivors hiding among the ruins of an army camp in the remote village of
Gam.
The Maoists had emerged from Nepal's scented pine forests late on Tuesday
night. They were not in a mood to dispense mercy. 'The male Maoists held the
officers down. The women Maoists then slit their necks using sickles,' Kapil
Shrestha, of Nepal's Human Rights Commission said. 'The women soldiers bear
far more grudges. Most of them have been raped by the police or their
families have been killed by the security forces.'
The battle in the remote western area of Nepal was merely the latest in a
series of gruesome encounters between the kingdom's rampant Maoist
guerrillas and government forces. Over the past week nearly 1,000 people
have been killed - a fact eclipsed by the blanket coverage of the far lesser
carnage in the Middle East.
The violence now threatens to engulf the entire Himalayan region, from
Afghanistan to Pakistan through India, Kashmir and Tibet.
In India, an increasingly aggressive Hindu nationalist government has done
virtually nothing to stop the slaughter of Muslims by Hindu gangs. More than
2,000 Muslims have died over the past two-and-a-half months in riots in the
prosperous western state of Gujarat. Intelligence reports circulating in
Washington and London, meanwhile, warn of a summer-long conflict between
India and Pakistan in Kashmir, where Islamic militants have been fighting a
separatist battle for 12 years.
In Tibet, revolt is stirring too. After a series of mysterious explosions,
the Chinese authorities recently arrested a senior Tibetan monk, Tenzin
Deleg Rinpoche. Almost unnoticed, the region is sliding into turmoil.
In Nepal, the Maoist rebels have been battling the government for six years.
Outsiders dismissed them as an eccentric throwback to an earlier era, but
over the past four months the Maoists have dramatically escalated their
campaign. They have blown up bridges and electricity stations, plunging
entire districts into darkness, destroyed water plants and tortured and
executed their opponents - chopping off limbs, slicing away skin, and
severing necks. Tourists, who once thronged the medieval streets of
Kathmandu, drifting between email kiosks and bagel bars, are staying away
and the country's economy is close to collapse.
In rural Nepal villagers no longer go out at night. They sit at home in a
state of mute, expectant terror. The situation has become so desperate that
the Nepalese government last week slashed the minimum fee for climbing Mount
Everest, its main tourist attraction, from $75,000 to $25,000. The sense of
creeping anarchy has even penetrated the country's national parks, where
illegal logging is rife and poachers last week shot dead and de-horned one
of the kingdom's last remaining rhinos.
Nepal's Prime Minister, Sher Bahadur Deuba, is seeking military assistance
from Britain and the United States, and last week President George Bush
promised him $20 million to help to crush the Maoists. American military
advisers have already secretly toured the Maoist-controlled west of the
country, reconnoitring its dense, lowland jungles, inaccessible mountain
valleys and poverty-stricken villages.
Tomorrow Deuba meets Tony Blair in Downing Street and there seems little
doubt that Britain will also offer assistance. 'We have a very long-standing
relationship with the Nepalese army,' a British diplomat in Kathmandu told
The Observer last night. 'That relationship will continue,' he added.
Nepal's immense neighbour, India, is also in crisis. The Hindu nationalist
BJP party in power in New Delhi has given every impression of tacitly
supporting the anti-Muslim pogroms in Gujarat. India's Prime Minister, Atal
Bihari Vajpayee, has refused to sack Gujarat's unrepentant Chief Minister,
Narendra Modi, despite frequent allegations that he instructed his officials
to allow Hindu mobs to rape, murder and burn their minority Muslim
neighbours. The death toll in Ahmedabad, Gujarat's shiny commercial centre,
rises every day. Early last week four Hindu youths spotted M. A. Kothawala,
a 35-year-old Muslim lecturer, riding to work. His beard gave him away. They
dragged him off his motorbike, stabbed him and burnt him alive. So far none
of the Hindus who attacked Muslims has been punished. Gujarat's Hindu police
force has shot dead more than 100 Muslims.
Despite the carnage, America has maintained a discreet silence on the
matter. India, its crucial ally in the region, is pro-American and
pro-Israeli (and likens its tough stand against Pakistan to Israel's
approach to the Palestinians). The communal riots began after a Muslim mob
incinerated 58 Hindu extremists on a train in the town of Godhra. A team of
British diplomats recently concluded that the massive anti-Muslim backlash
was 'pre-planned'.
There are few signs, meanwhile, that the 12-year insurgency by Muslim
Kashmiris against the Indian state is coming to an end. The daily death toll
in Kashmir, India's only Muslim majority province, is invariably higher than
in the Palestinian intifida, but it rarely merits more than a brief mention
in the foreign news pages. About 50,000 people - soldiers, militants,
civilians - have died. India has blamed the rebellion on Islamist jihadis
creeping across the border from Pakistan.
This is only half the story. Repeated human rights abuses by the 400,000
Indian soldiers stationed in the Kashmir valley against the civilian
population have ensured the movement is an indigenous one too. India's
Foreign Minister, Jaswant Singh, last week rejected the suggestion made by
the Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, that monitors should supervise Kashmir's
election later this year. His comments suggest New Delhi will, as on
previous occasions, rig the ballot to ensure victory for the National
Conference, part of the ruling BJP coalition. There is little sign of fresh
thinking on Kashmir from the Indian establishment, which sees the solution
to its difficulties as military rather than political.
The revolt in Kashmir, as in Nepal, however, is the result of political
disaffection and economic misery. Some 80 per cent of Nepal's 23 million
inhabitants are subsistence farmers. They lead medieval-style lives of
appalling hardship and have seen no benefit from either the country's
tourist industry or the arrival of democracy a decade ago. The Maoists are
strongest in the poorest parts of the country. In their stronghold of Rolpa,
the scene of last week's gruesome battles, per capita income is $100 a year
and life expectancy is 52.
The message of revolutionary justice espoused by the Maoists' shadowy
leader, Comrade Prachanda, has won its most enthusiastic response from a
rural underclass with nothing to lose: women, peasants at the bottom of the
caste heap, and the unemployed. Successive governments in Kathmandu have
been more concerned with lining their own pockets than dealing with a
far-away rural revolt. They hoped it would go away. It has not. Deuba, who
declared a state of emergency in November and sent in the army, has now
turned to the outside world for help.
There is nothing new about communal unrest or insurrection in South Asia,
but what differs about the most recent violence in Gujarat is that it has
taken place in the heart of India with the unambiguous evidence of state
involvement. India, as envisaged by Mahatma Gandhi and its first Prime
Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, was supposed to be a secular country, open to
people of all faiths.
But Hindu fundamentalists who pushed aside Nehru's fading Congress Party in
the mid-1990s have replaced his vision with something darker, fascist even.
They give the impression of wanting India's 120 million Muslims to disappear
or decamp to Muslim Pakistan. As Sunny Grewal, one of many BJP supporters
living in Britain, put it: 'Muslims of India should pack their bags and head
off to Pakistan. There is no room for the Satanic evil forces of Islam in
India. They don't belong on this earth. They are evil.'
'I think the forebodings are very grim,' Ramachandra Guha, one of India's
leading writers and environmentalists, added last night. 'Radical Hindus are
trying to turn India into a kind of Hindu Pakistan, along theological lines,
and with Hindus in charge rather than Muslims.'
Pakistan, meanwhile, has fared little better since independence. Its army
has repeatedly toppled the country's frequently venal and short-lived
civilian governments. And, with the Bangladesh war of 1971, the idea that
being a Muslim was enough to hold a state together was catastrophically
disproved when the country split in half. Like India, Pakistan, under
military dictator General Pervez Musharraf, has signed up to the US war on
terrorism (though not its support for Israel). He even won a spurious
referendum in which he was the only candidate. But Islamist extremists and
sectarian violence now threaten him with perpetual embarrassment.
Both India and Pakistan are facing crises of post-colonial identity - but
their predicament has scarcely been noticed because of the West's continuing
preoccupation with the troubles in the Middle East.
In Nepal, meanwhile, things get worse. As well as destroying the
infrastructure, the Maoists are infiltrating the Kathmandu valley, blowing
up politicians' homes and enforcing strikes. They may have only 7-12,000
fighters. But they have so far proved more than a match for Nepal's
45,000-strong, badly equipped army. 'The Maoists are a very intelligent
organisation. Their leaders are well educated. They are fired up with a
vision and sense of dynamism,' one Western diplomat in Kathmandu admitted
last night. It is only a matter of time before the rebels launch their next
ambush, scythes raised.
Guardian Unlimited
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
More information about the mobglob-discuss
mailing list