[mobglob-discuss] BUSH TERRORIST NETWORK ON THE BRINK OF MASS DESTRUCTION (fwd)

Tom_Childs at Douglas.BC.CA Tom_Childs at Douglas.BC.CA
Sun Jul 28 22:39:45 PDT 2002


...time to organize a neighborhood 'resistance' demo in your neighborhood...
take some digital images of it and post it to the internet via indymedia.org.  
....go for it.      regards, t.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ----- Forwarded message: -----
To: "stoptheWTO at topica.com" <stoptheWTO at topica.com>
From: Isidor <isidor at videotron.ca>
Subject: BUSH TERRORIST NETWORK ON THE BRINK OF MASS DESTRUCTION
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 15:13:44 -0400

Scott Ritter and UNCOMs Decommissioning of Iraq's Weapons


     [US "GOVERNMENT PLOTS MASSIVE TERRORIST ATTACK AGAINST IRAQ]


 "Ritter was careful to note that there are no good wars - as a 
veteran, he described war as purely awful and something not to be 
trivialized - but that there is such a thing as a just war. He 
described America as a good place, filled with potential and worth 
fighting for. We go to just war, he said, when our national existence 
has been threatened. 

According to Ritter, there is no justification in fact, national 
security, international law or basic morality to justify this coming 
war with Iraq. In fact, when asked pointedly what the mid-October 
scheduling of this conflict has to do with the midterm Congressional 
elections that will follow a few weeks later, he replied, simply, 
"Everything." 
 
                             ------

 "His purpose for coming to that room was straightforward: The Senate 
Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Democrat Joe Biden, plans to 
call a hearing beginning on Monday, July 29th. The Committee will
call forth witnesses to describe the threat posed to America by Iraq. 
Ritter fears that much crucial information will not be discussed in 
that hearing, precipitating a war authorization by Congress based on 
political expediency and ignorance. Scott Ritter came to that Boston 
classroom to exhort all there to demand of the Senators on the 
Committee that he be allowed to stand as a witness."

                             ------

 According to Ritter, there is no justification in fact, national 
security, international law or basic morality to justify this coming 
war with Iraq. In fact, when asked pointedly what the mid-October 
scheduling of this conflict has to do with the midterm Congressional 
elections that will follow a few weeks later, he replied, simply, 
"Everything." 

"This is not about the security of the United States," said this 
card-carrying Republican while pounding the lectern. "This is about 
domestic American politics. The national security of the United
States of America has been hijacked by a handful of neo-conservatives 
who are using their position of authority to pursue their own 
ideologically-driven political ambitions. The day we go to war for 
that reason is the day we have failed collectively as a nation." 

                             ------

"If Iraq was producing weapons today, we would have definitive
proof," said Ritter, "plain and simple." 

And yet we march to war, and soon. A chorus of voices was raised in 
the room asking why we are going. What motivates this, if not hard 
facts and true threats? According to Ritter, it comes down to 
opportunistic politics and a decade of hard anti-Hussein rhetoric
that has boxed the Bush administration into a rhetorical corner."

                             ------

The removal of Saddam Hussein became a plank in the GOP's race for
the Presidency in 2000. After gaining office, George W. Bush was 
confronted with the reality that he and many within his
administration had spent a great amount of political capital
promising that removal. Once in power, however, he came to realize 
what his father and Clinton already knew - talking tough was easy,
and instigating pinprick military confrontations was easy, but 
removing Hussein from power was not easy at all. His own rhetoric was 
all around him, however, pushing him into that corner which had only 
one exit. Still, like the two Presidents before him, he treaded
water. 

Then came September 11th. Within days, Bush was on television
claiming that the terrorists must have had state-sponsored help, and 
that state sponsor must be Iraq. When the anthrax attacks came, Bush 
blamed Iraq again. Both times, he had no basis whatsoever in fact for 
his claims. The habit of lambasting Iraq, and the opportunity to 
escape the rhetorical box twelve years of hard-talking American 
policy, were too juicy to ignore. 

The dearth of definitive proof of an Iraqi threat against America 
began to go international. Defense Secretary Rumsfeld appeared before 
NATO not long ago and demanded that they support America's looming 
Iraq war. Most of the NATO nations appeared ready to do so - they 
trusted that America's top defense official would not come before
them and lie. But when they tried to ask questions of him about the 
basis for this war, Rumsfeld absolutely refused to answer any of
them. Instead, he offered this regarding our utter lack of meaningful 
data to support a conflict: "The absence of evidence is not the 
evidence of absence." 

Scott Ritter appeared before NATO some days after this at their 
invitation to offer answers to their questions. Much of what he told 
them was mirrored in his comments in that Boston classroom. After he 
was finished, 16 of the 19 NATO nations present wrote letters of 
complaint to the American government about Rumsfeld's comments, and 
about our basis for war. American UN representatives boycotted this 
hearing, and denounced all who gave ear to Ritter. 

Some have claimed that the Bush administration may hold secret 
evidence pointing to a threat within Iraq, one that cannot be exposed 
for fear of compromising a source. Ritter dismissed this out of hand 
in Boston. "If the administration had such secret evidence," he said, 
"we'd be at war in Iraq right now. We wouldn't be talking about it.
It would be a fait accompli." Our immediate military action in 
Afghanistan, whose ties to Al Qaeda were manifest, lends great 
credence to this point. 

Ritter dismissed oil as a motivating factor behind our coming war
with Iraq. He made a good defense of this claim. Yes, Iraq has the 
second-largest oil reserves on earth, a juicy target for the 
petroleum-loving Bush administration. But the U.S. already buys some 
68% of all the oil produced in Iraq. "The Navy ships in the Gulf who 
work to interdict the smuggling of Iraqi oil," said Ritter, "are 
fueled by Iraqi oil." Iraq's Oil Minister has stated on camera that 
if the sanctions are lifted, Iraq will do whatever it takes to see 
that America's oil needs are fulfilled. "You can't get a better deal 
than that," claimed Ritter. 

His thinking on this aspect of the coming war may be in error. That 
sort of logic exists in an all-things-being-equal world of politics 
and influence, a world that has ceased to exist. Oil is a coin in the 
bargaining, peddled as influence to oil-state congressmen and
American petroleum companies by the Iraqi National Congress to
procure support for this baseless conflict. Invade, says the INC, put 
us in power, and you will have all you want. There are many ruling in 
America today, both in government and business, who would shed 
innocent blood for this opportunity. 

Ritter made no bones about the fact that Saddam Hussein is an evil 
man. Like most Americans, however, he detests being lied to. His work 
in Iraq, and his detailed understanding of the incredible 
technological requirements for the production of weapons of mass 
destruction, leads him to believe beyond question that there is no 
basis in fact or in the needs of national security for a war in Iraq. 
This Marine, this Republican who seemed so essentially hawkish that
no one in that Boston classroom would have been surprised to find 
wings under his natty blue sportcoat, called the man he cast a 
Presidential vote for a liar. 

"The clock is ticking," he said, "and it's ticking towards war. And 
it's going to be a real war  It's going to be a war that will result 
in the deaths of hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans and tens of 
thousands of Iraqi civilians. It's a war that is going to devastate 
Iraq. It's a war that's going to destroy the credibility of the
United States of America. I just came back from London, and I can
tell you this - Tony Blair may talk a good show about war, but the 
British people and the bulk of the British government do not support 
this war. The Europeans do not support this war. NATO does not
support this war. No one supports this war." 

It is of a certainty that few in the Muslim world support another 
American war with Iraq. Osamanbin Laden used the civilian suffering
in Iraq under the sanctions to demonstrate to his followers the evils 
of America and the West. Another war would exacerbate those 
already-raw emotions. After 9/11, much of the Islamic world
repudiated bin Laden and his actions. Another Iraq war would go a
long way to proving, in the minds of many Muslims, that bin Laden was 
right all along. The fires of terrorism that would follow this are
unimaginable. 

Scott Ritter wants to be present as a witness on Monday when the 
Foreign Relations Committee convenes its hearing, a hearing that will 
decide whether or not America goes to war in Iraq. He wants to share 
the information he delivered in that Boston classroom with Senators 
who have spent too many years listening to, or propounding,
rhetorical and speculative fear mongering about an Iraqi threat to 
America that does not exist. Instead, he wants the inspectors back in 
Iraq, doing their jobs. He wants to try and keep American and Iraqi 
blood from being spilled in a military exercise promulgated by 
right-wing ideologues that may serve no purpose beyond affecting the 
outcome of the midterm Congressional elections in November 2002. 

"This is not theory," said Ritter in Boston as he closed his
comments. "This is real. And the only way this war is going to be 
stopped is if Congress stops this war." 


On the web: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee:
http://foreign.senate.gov/committee/ 


William Rivers Pitt is a teacher from Boston, MA. His new book, 'The 
Greatest Sedition is Silence,' will be published soon by Pluto Press. 

Scott Ritter and UNCOMs decommissioning of Iraq's weapons - nobody 
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=194702
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=194699
                    

                      *****************************

 The Bush terrorists, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, Robert 
Zoellick, Richard Perle, Fony Blare, those "Congressmen" [sic(k)], 
those military chicken hawks, the Bilderberg Group, the CFR, the CIA, 
the Vatican, the Trilaterals, the British Monarchy and others, have 
got to be the most despicable pack of monsters that ever crawled the 
Earth. How any person can put up with these God damn bomb freaks is 
way beyond me!!!

Given the opportunity to be locked up in a room with any one of these 
pompous, greedy and conceited cocksuckers, I would smash their 
sickening faces with my bare hands! Make no mistake about it: YOU 
WOULDN'T HEAR A SINGLE LIE COMING OUT OF THEM AGAIN!! YES, I utterly 
HATE, LOATHE AND DESPISE these pathological liars, thieves, murderers 
and sycophants for what they have done and for what they are about to 
do.


THERE IS VERY LITTLE TIME LEFT!!

ISN'T IT HIGH TIME TO GET UP OFF YOUR ASSES
AND LOCK THESE BASTARDS UP??? 
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sincerely,


Isidor

P.S.: If this bunch of mass murderers destroys Iraq or any other 
country, I won't be wasting any more of my time writing! The sheeple 
of the U.S. will get what they deserve and there will be nothing left 
to say.

                 ***********************************

Millions on the streets would stop this War - DL 
War in October - William Pitt
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=194648


"Scott Ritter should be commended for speaking up against the 
impending Imperialist War on Iraq. But he is wrong to believe that
the sycophantic U.S. Congress will have the spine & integrity to stop
this Bush League Mad War disease. 

There is, of course, another way to stop this War. And that is for 
millions of citizens to stand up, marching down the streets and 
demanding an immediate stop to the War. It happened once during the 
aggressive war on Vietnam back in the 1970s. Yes, things are
different now, but activists have to remember that it took years to 
build a massive anti-war movement. It can happen again, but we will 
need to re-analyze very keenly, and we need to persevere for however 
long it takes to organize against the world's #1 terrorist state. 

The time is very short, so let's roll up our shirtsleeves and get 
started..."Don't Mourn, Organize!" 

                 ***********************************

The only JUST WAR I see is the war against this filthy pack of 
criminals that calls itself the US Government and all its agencies 
along with those Transnational banksters like the Bilderbergs, the 
CFR, the CIA, etc...etc...

Don't forget Plan America! - Isidor
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=192123&group=webcast

"I am one left wing guy who has had enough of this crap. Its 
impeachment time and not just for Bush and Cheney but for the filthy 
five Supreme Court Justices as well, for their role in fixing the 
election. The Joint Chiefs of Staff and any other officers involved 
must also go for their role in 9/11. I know for a fact that there are 
good people in the Military, the Intelligence Community and
throughout the government that know what is really going on and are 
capable of making a move against these crooks that have stolen our 
government. I am calling on those folks within our government to make 
that move now and breath life back into our dead Constitution. 

How can we possibly survive this politic that has come over this land 
without removing from power these cynical men and women that believe 
they own the right to rule as the Monarchs my family fled in 1620 to 
come to this great and wondrous land. 

I beg of you, it is time to risk all to take back of our stolen 
liberty." - By Lloyd Hart 
                    `
The Media Knows the Truth - Lloyd Hart 
Impeach the Filthy Five - sweet mother of mustafa
Time To Roll Out The Guillotine!! - Isidor
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=194663&group=webcast

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: Tom_Childs at Douglas.BC.CA

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84tq1.a9F5la
Or send an email to: stoptheWTO-unsubscribe at topica.com

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================



-- 
Tom Childs - Audio/Visual Resources
Douglas College Library
New Westminster, B.C. Canada
T:  604 527-5187
E:  childst at douglas.bc.ca
W:  http://www.globaljustice.ca
--









More information about the mobglob-discuss mailing list