[mobglob-discuss] Towards freedom: The G8 and beyond
martin william fournier
mfou1 at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 9 13:42:20 PDT 2002
Towards freedom: The G8 and beyond (suggested title)
By Martin Fournier, Anti-globalization activist
Were the recent G8 protests in Calgary effective in affecting positive
change? Is summit hopping, the practice of activists traveling to
globalization summits in large numbers, a now defunct strategy? Where is
the anti-globalization movement going? Does the movement have a unified
vision to keep its momentum? These are difficult questions for activists to
answer in these times of repression.
I am left pondering these questions after Canada spent $300 million to build
Fortress Kananaskis, a military bunker consisting of 21 checkpoints spread
along the road to a small resort town 90 kilometres north of Calgary. Canada
and the G8 administration guaranteed that no one would ever get close to the
leaders of the eight richest economies in the world by deploying 5000
soldiers, tanks, anti-aircraft defenses, missiles launchers and fighter jets
patrolling a wide-reaching no fly-zone above the resorts territory.
These incredibly brutal measures, coupled with a $300 000 bribe to the
Stoney Nation to prevent activists from erecting a temporary Solidarity
Village on their land which is a mere 25 kilometres away from Kananaskis,
ensured that no protesting took place near Bush and his Neoliberal cabinet
of ministers. Activists, being persistent individuals, decide to relocate
the action to Calgary.
Two main events occurred in Calgary, a counter summit, the summit of the
group of six billion (G6B) from June 21-25 and the usual Labour marches and
public protests throughout the week and during the actual summit (June 26 &
27). The G6B was by far the most effective in addressing critical issues
such as the African AIDS crisis, environmental deterioration, the
anti-terrorism agenda, global recession, social justice and the rise of
poverty brought on by one-way globalization trade. The G6B main
recommendations can be found online on Albertas Independent Media Centre:
www.alberta.indymedia.org/news/2002/06/3402.php
The marches and protests were successful in defeating public opinion about
protesters and violence. For the entire duration of the these events the
media wasnt able to report any violence, except from the odd isolated act
from yahoos, and for the first in North American protest history had to
report on what protesters actually do at protests. This included reported a
family march of 3000, various rallies ranging from 2500 to 7000
participants, a massive improvised street soccer game to paralyze an
intersection, a symbolic Die-in in which 100 protestors died on the
pavement to symbolically relate the ongoing suffering of Third World
countries, and a gigantic knitting circle, another tactic to paralyze
traffic and the 3000-strong police presence unnerving everyone. All these
actions happened during a tactic called snake marching in which the goal is
to constantly march around the economic district of a given city in order to
paralyze traffic and prevent workers to get to work, in essence to shut down
business and hit them where it hurts, the profit line.
The most radical action of the entire week was a 100-car caravan, including
approximately 400 activists, which went to the first checkpoint on the road
to Kananaskis Fortress. They were greeted with army personnel hiding under
nearby foliage and a barrage of bicycle cops, obviously stationed there to
present a positive image to tourists and unknowing travelers, to create a
positive and goodwill image of Canada to the rest of the world. After much
negotiations and nerve-racking deliberations the caravan was sent back to
Calgary (see Alberta Independent Media centre for amazing pictures of
K-country and the scary checkpoints: <alberta.indymedia.org>).
In retrospect, the Calgary actions were both a failure for the
anti-globalization movement and a victory. On one hand the actions were not
successful in getting the attention of the G8 leaders; they went ahead with
their meeting bunkered away in K-country. On the other hand, the use of
successful non-violent civil disobedience in the face of harsh repressive
measures showed the G8 leaders, and the world, the absurdity of spending so
much taxpayers money to defend against democracy; the actions of the G8
leadership are in all truth an admission of guilt and inefficiency; why did
they have to wall themselves in if they are working to better the world? In
just and fair democracies, transparency, openness, and consent are key to
decision-making. The G8 leaders again absurdly showed their contempt for
democracy.
Were the recent G8 protests in Calgary effective in truly delivering
positive change? Beyond a great PR coup the anti-G8 organizing in Calgary
didnt deliver on those promises. Summit hopping as it is now practiced does
not fulfill the aims of the anti-globalization movement, mainly to hold
Western governments and globalization accountable to the Earth citizens,
politically, socially, economically, and environmentally. Except Seattle and
some recent European protests (500 000 in Barcelona!) summit hopping has
been systematically analyzed and defeated by the authorities in question.
Does that mean that summit hopping is dead? Yes and no.
Summit hopping, especially for North Americans, is for many protestors very
costly and arduous to plan and organize, due in part to the vastness of our
countries and to the amount of coordination and communication it requires.
This last point also plays in the hands of the authorities; it is much
easier for the authorities to have a central focus on a single city and
their organizing committee to demoralize, instill fear and sabotage our
organizing efforts. These last observations are pointing to the birth of a
new era in the anti-globalization movement, and to the strengthening of our
vision(s); the local-to-global protest strategy.
An auspicious development for the anti-globalization movement happened in
two Canadian cities during the G8. In Ottawa a simultaneous, yet independent
campaign was organized to concur with the Calgary actions. It was called
Take the Capital!! and brought together 3000 or so activists to act
locally and replicate the Albertan scenario of snake marches and mass
non-violent civil disobedience. Apart from a little property damage there
was also no violence in Ottawa. But the protesters succeeded in hurting Big
Business for 2 consecutive days. The same scenario, although on a much
smaller scale with approximately 300 protestors showing, happened in
Vancouver. It was called Connecting the Dots and made links to Gordon
Campbell repressive regime, the G8 and globalization. In both cases the
protests made the headlines and sent shivers to Neoliberal business
executives everywhere.
A great many activists think the local-to-global organizing is the way the
movement is evolving. They can no longer justify using their already scarce
resources for a few days of heroic, but most often symbolic actions at mass
counter summit protests. They feel that staying in ones city or going to
ones closest regional metropolis is much more effective because it speaks
to ones regional targets and local issues, pinpointing to the direct
effects of the globalization architecture at home. This last point also
addresses the search for a vision for the movement; there is nowhere better
than home to attempt to practice and promote the change we want to see in
the world, whether it touches environmental issues, better and more
meaningful employment, the investment of regional profits, the management of
our regional conflicts, our involvment in addressing global social justice
issues through locally focused efforts, and so forth.
There has never been a better time than now to unite in our communities and
find the Enrons, Xeroxes, Tycos, Andersens, WorldComs, Bushs, Campbells,
Kleins, and all other criminal individuals and multinationals and show them
that without our consent they are nothing. It is time for all the peaceniks,
anarchists, unionists, communists, greens, and activists from all walks to
unite in each city and work locally to create local visions of how they want
to live and be the change they want to see, individually and collectively.
There is no need to search for a new global ideology that will unite the
movement when human life is based on a diversity of views and philosophies,
but we can apply locally oriented and positive environmental, social and
economic principles to empower ourselves as free individuals and regain our
communities and then let creativity and spontaneity rule. But first we must
act in concert locally to paralyze the profit-maximizing and greed-driven
machine that is capitalism as we know it. This is our common purpose and
vision; to experience self-empowerment anew in a new paradigm in which each
of us knows and acts according to what she/he see as positive and
fulfilling, and in harmony with the Earth of course.
Martin Fournier is a Vancouver-based anti-globalization activist and writer.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
More information about the mobglob-discuss
mailing list