[mobglob-discuss] (en) Slingshot #75 Grow or Die: The Death of the Earth by Capitalism - Squirrel (fwd)... (fwd)
Chris Shaw
csshawlab at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 1 14:26:35 PDT 2002
Tom:
It was indeed us out there on the road to Kananaskis. Thanks for the
article. Very prescient and accurate about the underlying pathology of
capitalism. Also, it's correct that it derives its 'philosophy' from a
patriarchal view of nature and a selective translation of the Old Testament
(also of Darwin, but this is a longer story). The biblical issue is the
definition of the Hebrew verb 'lecavesh' in Genesis when God tells Adam to
'subdue the earth'. Lecavesh can mean to capture or subdue; another
definition is to 'conserve and protect'. I happen to think that the latter
is the meaning originally intended.
Chris
>From: <Tom_Childs at Douglas.BC.CA>
>Reply-To: mobglob-discuss at resist.ca
>To: mobglob-discuss at resist.ca
>Subject: [mobglob-discuss] (en) Slingshot #75 Grow or Die: The Death of the
>Earth by Capitalism - Squirrel (fwd)... (fwd)
>Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 01:22:23 -0700
>
>Subscribers, A couple of us on this list talked "anarchy" out there on the
>road to Kananaskis last week, and well, at this moment I can't remember who
>was in the dialog...maybe a Jil and Chris if i'm not mistaken, but
>whoever..
>this particular post from "Slingshot" in San Francisco brought to mind the
>"anarchy" discussion and thought was worthwhile to pass on as a forward.
>We
>need to think of these things as the systems of governance go haywire on us
>and our world falls apart.. Regards, -tc
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ---- Forwarded message: ----
>From: Worker <a-infos-en at ainfos.ca>(http://slingshot.tao.ca/)
>To: <a-infos-en at ainfos.ca>
>Subject: (en) Slingshot #75 Grow or Die: The Death of the Earth by
> Capitalism - Squirrel
>
>Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 02:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
>
> ________________________________________________
> A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
> http://www.ainfos.ca/
> ________________________________________________
>
>Capitalism and a healthy environment cannot coexist together
>because of the economic theory behind capitalism and it is
>consistent need for new frontiers of exploitation.
>
>Environmental damage has reached alarming proportions.
>Almost daily there are new upwardly revised estimates of the
>severity of global warming, ozone destruction, topsoil loss,
>oxygen depletion from the clearing of rainforests, acid rain,
>dioxins in our body, pesticides residues in our food and water,
>the accelerating extinction rate of natural species, and so on.
>Or, as Kirkpatrick Sales puts it, ?the planet is on the road to
>and perhaps on the verge of global ecocide?.
>
>So how have we reached this point of almost ecological
>disaster? Many anarchists view the ecological crisis as rooted
>in the psychology of domination that emerged with the rise of
>patriarchy. Over time as these institutions took form and
>social domination became commonplace, these ideals were
>carried over into humanity?s role with Nature. The patriarchal
>belief system places higher value on linear, mechanistic,
>analytical, and rational qualities. Under patriarchy the
>intuitive, emotional, anarchic, and earthy are negatively
>perceived as passive, weak and irrational within patriarchy.
>Within the realms of this definition, nature became
>increasingly regarded as a mere resource, an object exploited
>and ruthlessly enslaved.
>
>Capitalism is the vehicle through which this psychology of
>domination finds its most ecologically destructive outlet.
>Capitalism causes the wasteful use of energy and material far
>beyond that needed for everyday living at a comfortable level.
>When one adds up all the raw materials and energy that go into
>the goods and services consumed over a lifetime, the toll on
>the environment is staggering. When this cost is multiplied out
>over the lifespan of families, cities and countries, the
>proportions are incredible.
>
>An example of wasted natural resources are the 200 Billion
>cans, bottles, plastic cartons and paper cups, are thrown away
>each year in the "developed" world. Corporate production
>focuses on "disposable" items rather than on quality or
>reliability, products are made for a one-time use because it
>ensures greater profits.
>
>Many eco-anarchists give the highest priority to dismantling
>capitalism. Bookchin states that capitalism ?in its endless
>devouring of nature will reduce the entire biosphere to the
>fragile simplicity of our desert and arctic biomes. We will be
>reversing the process of organic evolution, which has
>differentiated flora and fauna into increasingly complex forms
>and relationships, thereby creating a simpler and less stable
>world of life. The consequences of this appalling regression are
>predictable enough in the long run -- the biosphere will become
>so fragile that it will eventually collapse from the standpoint
>human survival needs and remove the organic preconditions
>for human life.?
>
>Capitalism must be eliminated because it cannot reform itself
>to become ?environmentally friendly?, despite what many
>green individuals believe. One might more easily persuade a
>green plant to desist from photosynthesis than to ask the
>bourgeois economy to desist from capital accumulation.
>
>Industrial production has increased fifty fold since 1950. Since
>capitalist corporations must continuously grow and expand, it
>can only mean disastrous consequences in a finite
>environment. Therefore, it is not practical to look for a
>solution to the ecological dilemma within the workings of
>capitalism, because ?grow or die? is inherent in its nature.
>
>What is the principle of grow or die?
>
>Capitalism is based on production for profit. In order to stay
>profitable, a firm must be able to produce goods and services
>cheaply enough to compete with other firms in the same
>industry. If one firm increases its productivity (as all firms
>must try to do), it will be able to produce more cheaply, thus
>undercutting its competition and gaining more market share,
>until eventually it forces less lucrative firms into bankruptcy.
>Moreover, as companies with higher productivity/profitability
>expand, they often realize economies of scale (e.g. getting bulk
>rates on larger quantities of raw materials), thus giving them
>even more of a competitive advantage over less
>productive/profitable enterprises. Hence, constantly increasing
>productivity is essential for capitalist survival.
>
>There are two ways to increase productivity, either by
>increasing the exploitation of workers (e.g. longer hours and/or
>more intense work for the same amount of pay) or by
>introducing new technologies that reduce the amount of labor
>necessary to produce the same product or service. Due to the
>struggle of workers to prevent increases in the level of their
>exploitation, new technologies are the main way that
>productivity is increased under capitalism (though of course
>capitalists are always looking for ways to increase the
>exploitation of workers on a given technology by other means
>as well).
>
>But new technologies are expensive, which means that in order
>to pay for continuous upgrades, a firm must continually sell
>more of what it produces, and so must keep expanding its
>capital (machinery, floor space, workers, etc.). Indeed, to stay
>in the same place under capitalism is to tempt crisis - thus a
>firm must always strive for more profits and thus must always
>expand and invest. In other words, in order to survive, a firm
>must constantly expand and upgrade its capital and production
>levels so it can sell enough to keep expanding and upgrading its
>capital -- i.e. "grow or die," or "production for the sake of
>production."
>
>Thus, it is impossible in principle for capitalism to solve the
>ecological crisis, because "grow or die" is inherent in its nature.
>
>
>As long as capitalism exists, it will necessarily continue its
>"endless devouring of nature," until it removes the "organic
>preconditions for human life." We do not have to wait until
>after the revolution to save the earth. Saving the earth is the
>revolution.
>
>Good Books to Read:
>Morris, Brian. Ecology and Anarchism: , Images Publishing
>(Malvern) Ltd, Malvern Wells, 1996.
>Bookchin, Murray, Toward an Ecological Society, Black Rose,
>Montreal, 1980.
>The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of
>Hierarchy, Cheshire Books, Palo Alto, California, 1982.
>Which Way for the Ecology Movement? AK Press,
>Edinburgh/San Francisco, 1994.
>The Philosophy of Social Ecology, Black Rose Books,
>Montreal/New York, 1990.
>
> slingshot at tao.ca
>
>
>*******
> ********
> ****** The A-Infos News Service ******
> News about and of interest to anarchists
> ******
> COMMANDS: lists at ainfos.ca
> REPLIES: a-infos-d at ainfos.ca
> HELP: a-infos-org at ainfos.ca
> WWW: http://www.ainfos.ca/
> INFO: http://www.ainfos.ca/org
>
>-To receive a-infos in one language only mail lists at ainfos.ca the message:
> unsubscribe a-infos
> subscribe a-infos-X
> where X = en, ca, de, fr, etc. (i.e. the language code)
>
>
>--
> "To straighten a curved piece of bamboo, first you must bend it in
> the opposite direction and hold it there for a while. Then when
> you release it, it will slowly straighten itself."
> --Ho Chi Minh
>
>Tom Childs - Audio/Visual Resources
>Douglas College Library
>New Westminster, B.C. Canada
>T: 604 527-5187 - Library
>T: 604 524-9316 - Home
>E: childst at douglas.bc.ca
>W: http://www.globaljustice.ca
>--
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>mobglob-discuss mailing list
>mobglob-discuss at resist.ca
>http://resist.ca/mailman/listinfo/mobglob-discuss
Christopher A. Shaw, Ph.D
Associate Professor
Research Pavilion
828 W. 10th Ave.
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada, V5Z 1L8
tel: 604-875-4111 (ext. 68375)
Fax: 604-875-4376
e-mail: csshawlab at hotmail.com
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
More information about the mobglob-discuss
mailing list