[IPSM] article: Jailing aboriginal protesters ‘too harsh,' appeal court says

[samir]

    Jailing aboriginal protesters ‘too harsh,' appeal court says

MICHAEL OLIVEIRA

The Canadian Press

July 7, 2008 at 6:13 PM EDT

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080707.wnativeoccupation0707/BNStory/National/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20080707.wnativeoccupation0707 
<http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080707.wnativeoccupation0707/BNStory/National/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20080707.wnativeoccupation0707>

TORONTO — There was no reason to “bring down the hammer” on seven 
aboriginals who were incarcerated and fined after protesting against 
mining projects in their communities, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled 
Monday in calling the six-month sentences “too harsh.”

Six members of the Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug First Nation served 
almost 10 weeks in jail, while Ardoch Algonquin First Nation leader Bob 
Lovelace was jailed 14 weeks for contempt-of-court charges related to 
blockades in areas north of Kingston, Ont., and Thunder Bay, Ont.

In late May, the Ontario Court of Appeal reduced their six-month 
sentences to time served, and today it released its reasons for the 
decision, saying imprisoning the protesters only magnified the 
“estrangement of aboriginal peoples from the Canadian justice system.”

The court also dismissed the fines of between $10,000 and $25,000 the 
protesters faced.

Mr. Lovelace said he was thrilled by the decision, which he hoped would 
allay protesters' fears of being jailed when they rally or man blockades 
for causes they believe in.

“I did do three-and-a-half months in jail, and that's three-and-a-half 
months lost out of my life, but I guess if it brings some clarification 
to aboriginal rights, that was time well spent,” Mr. Lovelace said.

“I think it's really significant because it says to people who have a 
legitimate cause that when governments are not willing to meet their 
obligations or their responsibilities – particularly with First Nations 
people, but I think with citizens in general – then it's not the court's 
responsibility to punish you. It's really their responsibility to uphold 
the rule of law but also to do it in a just and reasonable way.”

The protesters had been trying to stop mining on their traditional lands 
and complained the Ontario government had not consulted with the 
communities before giving the companies the go-ahead to begin drilling.

A panel of three judges ruled the aboriginals' right to protest “cannot 
simply be dismissed as illusory, flawed or weak,” and that Superior 
Court Justice George Smith failed to consider their plight and handed 
out sentences that were “too harsh.”

“That the court found it necessary to imprison the [protesters] simply 
serves to emphasize the gulf between the dominant culture's sense of 
justice and this First Nation's sense of justice,” the decision says.

“Imprisonment, far from being a meaningful sanction for the community, 
had the effect of pitting the community against the justice system.”

The panel said the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that judges must 
take into account all available sanctions other than imprisonment and 
give particular consideration to the circumstances of aboriginal 
offenders and the “unique systemic or background factors” that may have 
spurred their offences.

“[Judge Smith] focused exclusively on punishment and deterrence, both 
specific and general,” the decision states. “He said nothing about 
promoting reformation and rehabilitation of leaders of a First Nation 
community.”

Mr. Lovelace said he was relieved the court waived the fines and also 
found the protesters were entitled to their costs of the appeal.

“My faith in the Canadian justice system is strengthened,” he said.

Deputy Grand Chief Alvin Fiddler of the Nishnawbe Aski Nation, which 
represents 49 Ontario aboriginal communities, said the decision is 
meaningful for all First Nations and leaders who are fighting to protect 
their land.

“It's a good decision for communities to be able to say no, and they 
won't be jailed for doing that,” he said.

But KI First Nation spokesman Sam McKay, who spent 10 weeks in jail, 
said the news is promising but doesn't guarantee better relations with 
the government.

“They've failed to recognize Supreme Court rulings that they could have 
taken into consideration before putting us into jail, so will they want 
to recognize this? That's the question.”