[IPSM] Tories change environmental report on MGP to suit themselves
Macdonald Stainsby
mstainsby at resist.ca
Wed Oct 11 21:01:28 PDT 2006
this should not be surprising; the Tories are as pro-tarsands as
possible, and without killing the land near the Deh Cho, there will be
no energy to pull oil from tar in Alberta.
To stop them destroying the land in "Alberta", we must stop them in the
"Northwest Territories". The yin to their yang, if you will.
Macdonald
Tories change pipeline assessment report
*Mike De Souza, CanWest News Service
October 7/06 - The federal government has watered down an environmental
assessment of a major natural gas pipeline project in northern Canada by
erasing references to pollution reduction targets and the Kyoto
protocol, CanWest News Service has learned.
The proposed Mackenzie Gas Project, sponsored by several major oil
companies including Imperial Oil and Shell, could result in emissions
equivalent to adding 5.5 million cars to the road, environmentalists
estimate.
A new assessment, submitted by Environment Canada on Monday,
acknowledges the project could increase greenhouse gas emissions and air
pollution in the Northwest Territories and northern Alberta. But instead
of recommending immediate short-term targets, it says the Conservative
government is working with other countries on a "long-term" approach to
climate change.
"This is something that we had feared," said Sierra Club of Canada
spokeswoman Emilie Moorhouse. "They are not going to address the urgency
of this problem."
The original 32-page assessment by Environment Canada from June 1, 2005,
when the Liberals were in power, had an entire section about the
international Kyoto agreement, identifying the proposed Mackenzie Gas
Project as a "Large Final Emitter." The previous Liberal government had
proposed mandatory targets for all LFEs -- companies in the mining,
manufacturing, oil and gas, electricity and thermal sectors.
"Recognizing the threat posed by climate change, governments from the
majority of the world's nations negotiated the Kyoto Protocol to the
United Nations Framework on Climate Change, an agreement to reduce the
emissions of [greenhouse gases] from developed countries," reads one of
the lines in the 2005 submission that was deleted.
"Targets for new facilities such as the [Mackenzie Gas Project] will be
based on [best available technology] performance standards, an approach
which will assist in technological advances and innovation."
Moorhouse said the deleted paragraphs contradict recent claims by
Environment Minister Rona Ambrose, who insisted her government was
committed to Kyoto and planned to get tough with large industrial polluters.
William Cook, an Environment Canada spokesman, said references to the
Kyoto accord were removed to reflect the new government's "emphasis on
real reductions in greenhouse gas emissions for the long-term."
--
Macdonald Stainsby
http://independentmedia.ca/survivingcanada
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green
In the contradiction lies the hope
--Bertholt Brecht.
More information about the IPSM-l
mailing list