[IPSM] Senate Heads Back Down Controversial Road to Arctic Refuge Drilling
Macdonald Stainsby
mstainsby at resist.ca
Sat Mar 18 02:09:08 PST 2006
for those who actually want to survive the coming oil crash, or those
who believe that genocide is no less evil when it targets indigenous
nations, this should be of major concern.
Macdonald
Senate Heads Back Down Controversial Road to Arctic Refuge Drilling
WASHINGTON - March 17 - The Senate voted last night to once again
include drilling revenues from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in
the federal budget, despite their defeat on a similar measure just
months ago. Ignoring warnings about America’s oil addiction, a recent
oil spill just to the west of the Arctic Refuge, and staunch opposition
to sneaking the controversial provision into the budget, the Senate
voted 51-49 in favor of the Budget Resolution which includes a
speculative $3 billion to the federal treasury from Arctic drilling. The
House, where Arctic drilling was blocked just last year, has yet to act
on a budget this year.
"We deeply regret that some Senators are still willing to do Big Oil’s
bidding, and we now turn to the House where the Arctic drilling scheme
should be dead on arrival," said Carl Pope, Sierra Club Executive
Director. "Americans are clamoring for a clean Congress and a clean
energy plan, but sadly they were shortchanged on both today."
In a move to limit debate and opposition, drilling-obsessed politicians
like Senator Stevens (R-AK) and Pete Domenici (R-NM) -- aided by Budget
Chairman Judd Gregg (R-NH) -- are trying to sidestep the normal Senate
rules by making this an "Arctic only" budget bill: the only instruction
Sen. Gregg sent was to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
"By using the budget bill primarily as a vehicle for Arctic Refuge
drilling, the Senate has dropped any pretense of working to balance the
budget or reduce the deficit," said Pope. "The Senate is treating the
budget process as a joke and a special interest gravy boat."
As the Senate voted on whether to let the oil industry in to the
pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, BP workers in Alaska scrambled
to contain a 200,000 gallon oil spill that went undetected for days. The
spill, now widely reported as the largest crude oil spill in the history
of the North Slope, casts doubt on the oil industry’s assurances of safe
and clean technology.
"Blind to the dangers of oil drilling and what it could mean for
wildlife and Alaska natives, advocates of Arctic drilling maniacally
push forward," said Pope. "The only winner in this equation is the oil
industry. The losers are the American people who could lose a pristine
wilderness, perhaps to a fate similar to the oil-stained Prudhoe Bay."
The next step is the Senate Energy Committee which will craft
legislation to authorize opeing the Arctic Refuge to oil drilling. That
language will be folded into the overall Budget Reconciliation bill
which must be passed by the entire Senate. The Senate will then have to
conference its version with the House which has not yet taken up a
budget resolution this year. The conference report is then subject to a
straight up or down vote in both the House and Senate.
Last year, a similar attempt failed to pass the House of Representatives
where objections from moderate Republicans forced leadership to strip
Arctic drilling language from a larger budget package. In a desperate
move, Senator Stevens attached Arctic drilling to a defense spending
bill, a move that was repudiated by the Senate.
"We thank those Senators, both Republican and Democrat, who stood firm
against tremendous pressure from the Bush administration, pro-drilling
members of Congress and their allies in the oil industry," said Pope.
"They recognize that the budget is an inappropriate place to decide
controversial national policy matters like America's energy policy. We
urge all members of Congress to remain steadfast in their belief that
the vast, unspoiled wilderness of America’s Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge is more than a line item in the Federal Budget."
We can start saving oil today and curb global warming by making our cars
go farther on a gallon of. Using existing fuel-saving technology, we
could save more oil by increasing fuel economy than we currently import
from the entire Persian Gulf and could ever get out of the Arctic
Refuge, combined. The technology also exists to develop renewable energy
sources like wind and solar power while boosting energy efficiency.
"We need an honest, balanced energy plan that gives us cleaner, cheaper
and safer energy solutions and protects spectacular wild places like the
Arctic Refuge and America’s fragile coasts," said Pope.
###
--
Macdonald Stainsby
http://independentmedia.ca/survivingcanada
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green
In the contradiction lies the hope
--Bertholt Brecht.
More information about the IPSM-l
mailing list