[Busriders-van] Has Translink broken their own rules on RAV?

[Jim Shewchuk]

Hello everyone,

     If I recall Translink ex-chairman "King" George Puil's rants correctly, to revisit a 
subject without an intervening change in the board, the Translink board must first vote in 
favor of revisiting by a 2/3 majority.  I have not noticed a vote satisfying this requirement 
in the minutes of the recent meetings.  Assuming the rules have not been changed, 
does this mean that the multiple RAV votes (after the first rejection) are therefore 
invalid?

    True, this amounts to a technicality, but could provide a delaying tactic.