[antiwar-van] WW: CPP on terror list.
Macdonald Stainsby
mstainsby at tao.ca
Tue Sep 3 20:42:17 PDT 2002
-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Sept. 5, 2002
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------
BECAUSE THEY "OPPOSE U.S. PRESENCE",
STATE DEPT. ADDS PHILIPPINE LEFT TO "TERRORIST" LIST
By Scott Scheffer
The U.S. State Department has added two groups from the
Philippines--the Communist Party of the Philippines and its
armed wing, the New People's Army--to the list of so-called
Foreign Terrorist Organizations.
If this were not such a serious development, it would be
laughable that the U.S. government--currently on the brink
of a catastrophic war against the people of Iraq--is
accusing anyone else of violence or terror.
After all, neither the NPA nor the CPP has dropped 5,000-lb.
bombs from warplanes killing thousands of civilians--the way
the U.S. military has in Afghanistan. Nor has either one
poisoned the land or people with depleted uranium weapons--
the way the U.S. military did in Iraq and Yugoslavia. The
list of just the most recent terror crimes by the Pentagon
is long.
Jose Maria Sison, who founded the CPP in 1968, pointed out
in an Aug. 14 news conference that, on the contrary, the NPA
"abides strictly by its own Rules of Discipline." He said
all NPA soldiers are required to adhere to "the Guide for
Establishing the People's Democratic Government, which
serves as the constitution for the areas under NPA control."
He further pointed out that this people's army lives up to
the Geneva Conventions and Protocol I--international law in
situations of internal armed conflict.
The State Department maneuver was unexpected because the
corporate press in the United States has been focused on Abu
Sayyaf--a small group characterized by the Philippine
movement as bandits without any relationship to the
progressive struggle.
U.S. troops had been sent to the Philippines, according to
the media and the government, to combat Abu Sayyaf, not the
NPA.
Yet, suddenly, according to an Aug. 9 State Department memo,
the NPA is being called a terrorist organization because it
"strongly opposes any U.S. presence in the Philippines and
has killed U.S. citizens there."
The charge omits the fact that the U.S. citizens were four
soldiers killed in an NPA attack more than a decade ago, at
a time when the U.S. military had a huge presence at Clark
Air Force Base and Subic Bay Naval Base.
Demonstrations against the Pentagon presence had grown so
large and frequent that the brass ultimately had to close
both bases--the two biggest outside the continental U.S. It
was a stinging blow to their imperial prestige. And, it was
politically difficult for the U.S. media, in the atmosphere
that existed at that time, to sensationalize the incident in
which the U.S. soldiers were killed. Better to take the
licking quietly, they probably thought at the time.
Even when the events of Sept. 11, 2001, gave them the
political capital and confidence to try to recoup their
losses, they were compelled to use a campaign against the
relatively insignificant Abu Sayyaf as a way to test the
waters for a renewed U.S. intervention in the Philippines.
A CRIME TO 'OPPOSE U.S. PRESENCE'?
The rationale for singling out the NPA--that it "strongly
opposes any U.S. presence in the Philippines"--is also true
of dozens of other Filipino people's organizations. Filipino
sovereignty is a common thread uniting organizations from
all sectors of society, including peasants, students,
workers, groups fighting for the rights of women, gay and
transgender people, the many oppressed indigenous
nationalities and the oppressed Muslims of the southern
Philippines.
Since the administration of President Gloria Macapagal-
Arroyo signed on to the Bush/Cheney "war on terrorism,"
stepped-up repression has been launched against all these
people's organizations, as well as a campaign of mass
arrests in the Muslim areas of the south. Defense Secretary
Angelo Reyes, in particular, has been threatening to go
after all the so-called "front groups" of the CPP. The
government has even threatened and red-baited the militant
trade union confederation KMU.
Pentagon military planners have always coveted the
Philippine islands, with their strategic location in the
Pacific, as a forward base in Asia and a stepping stone to
China. From 1898 to 1946, the U.S. military occupied and
held the islands as a colony of Wall Street. Since the
humiliation of being kicked out in 1992, Washington has been
looking for an excuse to return.
The giant U.S. oil companies want to get their hands on the
unknown amounts of oil under the South China Sea, and also
make sure that no one else gains access to nearby deposits
of natural gas off Indonesia--which is 20 percent of the
world's supply.
They've found the Arroyo administration to be more than
helpful, but standing in their way are the 12,000-armed
partisans of the NPA and the hundreds of thousands of
Filipinos who are part of the broad movement opposing U.S.
imperialism.
This movement has proven to be tenacious and formidable. The
imperialists have been proceeding cautiously until now. An
all-out campaign to retake the Philippines would be
reckless, but that doesn't mean it's out of the question.
The anti-war movement here in the United States needs to up
the ante and build real solidarity with the Filipino
struggle.
- END -
(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
ww at wwpublish.com. Subscribe wwnews-on at wwpublish.com.
Unsubscribe wwnews-off at wwpublish.com. Support the voice of
resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)
-------------------------------------------
Macdonald Stainsby
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international
--
In the contradiction lies the hope.
--Bertholt Brecht
More information about the antiwar-van
mailing list